Die wêreld, en veral natuurlik lande soos die VSA en Suid-Afrika, is besig om rasmal te raak. Enkele dae gelede het ‘n 21-jarige blanke Amerikaner, Dylann Roof, in ‘n kerk op swart gemeentelede losgebrand en nege van hulle doodgeskiet. Enkele ure later is hy aangekeer en intussen is ‘n eienaardige Facebook-foto van hom met die ou Suid-Afrikaanse en Rhodesiese vlae daarop gepubliseer. Dis heeltemal moontlik dat dit ‘n gemanipuleerde foto kan wees, want ons weet almal dat Photoshop en ander grafiese programme ‘n mens in staat stel om enige digitale foto te kan omskep in enigiets. Trouens, in aksiefilms word motors en geboue digitaal “opgeblaas”, dus is die aanbring van twee vlaggies op ‘n baadjie sommer kinderspeletjies. (Ek het nie eens Photoshop op my rekenaar nie, maar sal dieselfde met ‘n gratis Linuxprogram genaamd Gimp kan doen.) Daar is ook berig dat Dylann Roof psigiatriese medikasie gebruik wat gewelddadige gedrag by ander pasiënte veroorsaak het.
‘n PRAAG-ondersteuner, Henri le Riche, het ‘n ontleding van die Roof-baadjie-foto op sy woernaal gedoen onder die titel: #CharlestonShooting – Photo of shooter manipulated by adding flags on top of Obama Election Emblem.
Die verhaal wat die hoofstroommedia aan ons opdis, is die volgende: dat Dylann Roof weens blootstelling aan “rassistiese” of “haatgroepe” op die internet daarvan oortuig geraak het dat ‘n blanke volksmoord voor die deur lê en daarom het hy tot die massamoord oorgegaan. Die New York Times se korrespondent in Suid-Afrika, Lydia Polgreen, het laas nog oor die “geslaagde grondhervorming in Zimbabwe” gepopel – terwyl Zimbabwe tans weer hongersnood in die gesig staar al ontvang die land rééds $1 miljard aan hulpgeld, asook voedselhulp vir drie miljoen mense. Dieselfde Polgreen het nou in die blaaie van die New York Times losgetrek en blameer sommer alle blankes vir Roof se daad, behalwe dat sy die “twee rassistiese state”, Suid-Afrika en Rhodesië, aan hom verbind. Die veelseggende titel van haar stuk is: From Ferguson to Charleston and beyond, anguish about race keeps building. Let op die gebruik van die woord “anguish” of “angs”. Nadat die Berlynse Muur afgebreek is, was linkses vir ‘n dekade of so ‘n bietjie in hul dop gekruip, maar “ras” blyk ‘n veel vrugbaarder propagandaterm te wees as “klas”. Daarom word ons elke dag met die soveelste “rassevoorval” in die hoofstroommedia begroet: of dit nou laerskoolkinders by die Curro-skool Roodeplaat is wat nie “gemeng genoeg” uit die bus uit klim nie is, of ‘n versteurde blanke wat nege swartes in ‘n kerk in Charleston, Suid-Carolina, doodskiet.
Op 25 Julie 1993 het vier “vryheidsvegters” van APLA tydens ‘n erediens by die St. James-kerk in Kenilworth, Kaapstad, ingestorm en met outomatiese wapens op die gemeente losgebrand. Hulle het ook handgranate gebruik om die weerlose kerkgangers aan te val. Elf mense is gedood en 58 gewond. Indien een van die kerkgangers, Charl van Wyk, nie met sy .38-kortlooprewolwer begin terugskiet het nie, sou selfs méér mense gesterf het. In daardie geval was die aanvallers swart en die slagoffers blank. Die aanval is egter geensins aan alle swartmense of “swart rassisme” jeens blankes verbind nie. Trouens, die swart Amerikaanse leier, eerwaarde Jesse Jackson van die “Rainbow Coalition” (waarvan Suid-Afrika se “reënboognasie” afkomstig is) het besoek aan die Suid-Afrikaanse ambassade in Washington gebring en die daad aan “apartheid” toegeskryf! Jackson het volgens ‘n berig in Beeld van 29 Julie 1993 verklaar:
”As deel van die internasionale gemeenskap rou ons oor die verlies van hierdie jongste slagoffers van die barbaarse apartheidstelsel, soos ons in die verlede gerou het oor die duisende slagoffers van staatsgeborgde terrorisme wat in tronke dood is weens marteling, wat in Bantoestans dood is weens verhongering, of doodgeskiet is ten tyde van vreedsame betogings’.”
As swart terroriste moor, is diegene wat hulle doodskiet bloot “slagoffers van die barbaarse apartheidstelsel”, maar as ‘n blanke – na bewering, want ons het nog geen regstreekse getuienis dat hy wel die daad gepleeg het nie – op swart kerkgangers skiet, is alle blankes aandadig, weens “internasionale blanke rassisme en wit heerssug”. Dus, dit maak nie saak wie die sneller trek of wie die slagoffers is nie, die blankedom sal altyd die skuld kry. Vandaar dus ook Lydia Polgreen se treurmare oor die groot aantal (meer as ‘n miljoen) swart Amerikaanse misdadigers wat tans in die gevangenis verkeer en, soos sy dit stel, “if current trends continue, one in three black men are expected to spend time in prison at some point in their lives”. Dis nie hul gedrag of die misdade wat die probleem is nie, dis “blanke heerssug”. Trouens, die jongste term wat deur rashisterici rondgeslinger word, is “strukturele rassisme”. Polgreen haal ‘n swart aktivis en “styldeskundige”, Michaela Angela Davis, aan wat dié term gebruik. Soos alle slagspreuke uit die VSA klakkeloos deur plaaslike linkses oorgeneem word, kan ‘n mens maar seker wees dat dit binnekort in die blaaie van Beeld of Die Burger ook sal verskyn, uit die pen Adriaan Basson of Max du Preez. Berei dus maar voor om “strukturele rassisme” nog sommer baie te hoor; dis die boetie van die kulturele marxis, Herbert Marcuse, se begrip dóér uit die sestigerjare, toe hy gepraat het van die “strukturele geweld” van kapitalisme. Eers was daar “strukturele geweld”, nou is daar “strukturele rassisme”. Hoe meer dinge verander, hoe meer bly hulle dieselfde.
Volgens beskikbare meningsopnames glo die meerderheid Amerikaners nie meer die amptelike weergawe van die gebeure op 11 September 2001 toe twee vliegtuie in die World Trade Center vasgevlieg het nie. ‘n Aansienlike persentasie meen dat dit óf die Israeli’s óf die Bush-regerings self is wat agter die terreur van daardie dag sit. Hoe gebeur dit dat ‘n 21-jarige jongman sommer by ‘n swart kerk inloop en nege mense doodskiet? Direk daarna word foto’s van hom by die ingang van die kerk en van sy baadjie met ou SA en Rhodesiese vlae wêreldwyd gepubliseer. En hy word binne enkele ure in hegtenis geneem. Indien hy werklik ses maande lank aan sy daad beplan het, sou hy hom tog kon vermom het, vals nommerplate op sy motor gehad het, ens., tensy hy gevang wóú word. Of tensy een van die VSA se 18 duistere geheime dienste wat mense in kampe oral ter wêreld martel en allerlei sielkundige eksperimente op hulle uitvoer, ‘n handjie daarin gehad het… Wie weet?
Oor die egtheid van die voorval en van die vlae op die baadjie, sal ons seker tydens die hofsaak wat kom, moet oordeel. Bygesê: as daar ‘n hofsaak is, want soms word sulke “massamoordenaars” mos gerieflikheidshalwe deur ander gevangenes om die lewe gebring. Aangesien die meerderheid gevangenes in Amerikaanse tronke swart is, kan ons nou al voorspel dat Roof, die “wit, rassistiese moordenaar” nie baie gewild by sy medegevangenes gaan wees nie. Hopelik oorleef Roof totdat hy in die hof kan verskyn.
Roof se borgaansoek op die moordklagtes is reeds afgekeur, dus verkeer hy incommunicado in die tronk. Intussen gaan die “vertelling” rondom hom egter ongesteur in die hoofstroommedia voort. Die jongste bewering is dat hy glo ‘n webblad by die domein lastrhodesian.com bedryf het, waarop hy, soortgelyk aan die Noorse skieter Anders Breivik, ‘n “rassistiese manifes van 2000 woorde” sou gepubliseer het. Ek het intussen ondersoek ingestel en, hoewel die domein lyk my intussen vanlyn gehaal is, met behulp van Google se kasgeheue wel die teks kon aflaai. Volgens “Whois”-inligting is die domein op 9 Februarie 2015 geregistreer, maar nêrens kon ek sien dat die domein spesifiek aan Roof verbind word nie, aangesien die privaatheid van die ware eienaar deur die registrateur beskerm word. So iets word gewoonlik teen ekstra koste gedoen. Indien Roof sy manifes wou publiseer, waarom sou hy lastrhodesian.com se eienaarskap wou verdoesel?
In sy (beweerde) manifes sê Roof die volgende oor die Amerikaanse Suide en oor Suid-Afrika:
Some people feel as though the South is beyond saving, that we have too many blacks here. To this I say look at history. The South had a higher ratio of blacks when we were holding them as slaves. Look at South Africa, and how such a small minority held the black in apartheid for years and years. Speaking of South Africa, if anyone thinks that think will eventually just change for the better, consider how in South Africa they have affirmative action for the black population that makes up 80 percent of the population.
It is far from being too late for America or Europe. I believe that even if we made up only 30 percent of the population we could take it back completely. But by no means should we wait any longer to take drastic action.
Is Roof se verhaal eg of verteenwoordig dit een groot manipulasie? Die redes vir so ‘n manipulasie is voor die hand liggend: Regoor die wêreld is daar ‘n ontwaking van patriotiese gevoelens onder blanke volkere, veral in Europa. Terwyl die swartman in Suid-Afrika slegs 20 jaar gelede as ‘n onskuldige slagoffer van blanke boosheid beskou is, met Mandela as ‘n soort heilige en martelaar, is die bordjies redelik onlangs verhang en word die swartman deesdae as die dader gesien wat op ongekende skaal in ons land moor, roof en verkrag. Die Zuma-bewind se korrupsie en spandabelheid het ook die “morele kapitaal” van die ANC selfs in die hoofstroommedia uitgeput. Die stelsel van swart oorheersing in Suid-Afrika, asook regstellende aksie in die VSA en immigrasie na Europa, is gegrond op die idee dat swartes en Arabiere eintlik net onskuldige slagoffers van Westerse boosheid is wat verdien om in magsposisies oor blankes aangestel te word. Beleefde versoeke van Afrikaners dat ons taalregte en menseregte eerbiedig moet word, word byvoorbeeld honend deur linkses met uitroepe van “verlange na blanke heerssug” begroet.
In meerdere of mindere mate, geld hierdie situasie dwarsdeur die Westerse wêreld en by uitstek in die VSA waar blankes in sommige stede en deelstate reeds in die minderheid verkeer. Linkse blankes en swartes is met ‘n onophoudelike propaganda-oorlog rondom die begrippe “ras” en “rassisme” besig, wat dié tussen die Weste en die ou USSR tydens die koue oorlog na ‘n vulletjie laat lyk.
In haar kommentaar op Dylann Roof se beweerde massamoord het mev. Hillary Clinton na “Amerika se lang stryd met ras” verwys:
“It’s tempting to dismiss a tragedy like this as an isolated incident, to believe that in today’s America bigotry is largely behind us, that institutionalized racism no longer exists. But despite our best efforts and our highest hopes, America’s long struggle with race is far from finished.”
Elke rassevoorval, gefabriseer, gemanipuleer of nie, sal as ammunisie in dié konstante sielkundige en inligtingstryd gebruik word.
Dit geld veral ‘n geval soos dié van Dylann Roof en sy aanval op die Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, Suid-Carolina.
Dylann Roof’s manifesto can be read here:
http://www.counter-currents.com/2015/06/dylann-roofs-manifesto/#more-55958
Ek twyfel of die seun self die manifesto geskryf het. Op die foto lyk hy verbouereerd, en is hy heel waarskynlik staangemaak en teen sy wil afgeneem. Waarskynlik is hy – soos Tsafendas – gebreinspoel om te moor. Ek sou baie verbas wees as die FBI nie agter die hele voorval sit nie. Hillary Clinton en andere het dadelik na die voorval geweer-beheer bepleit…
Vir die forensiese mense: http://www.globalresearch.ca/south-carolina-church-shooting-were-dylann-roof-photos-digitally-altered-disturbing-forensic-evidence/5457161
An open-access website called fotoforensics.com analyzes digital images to detect potential alteration. One of the techniques offered at the site is Error Level Analysis.
According to the site’s tutorial on ELA:
Error Level Analysis (ELA)permits identifying areas within an image that are at different compression levels. With JPEG images, the entire picture should be at roughly the same level. If a section of the image is at a significantly different error level, then it likely indicates a digital modification …
ELA highlights differences in the JPEG compression rate. Regions with uniform coloring, like a solid blue sky or a white wall, will likely have a lower ELA result (darker color) than high-contrast edges. The things to look for:
Edges. Similar edges should have similar brightness in the ELA result. All high-contrast edges should look similar to each other, and all low-contrast edges should look similar. With an original photo, low-contrast edges should be almost as bright as high-contrast edges.
Textures. Similar textures should have similar coloring under ELA. Areas with more surface detail, such as a close-up of a basketball, will likely have a higher ELA result than a smooth surface.
Surfaces. Regardless of the actual color of the surface, all flat surfaces should have about the same coloring under ELA.
Look around [a] picture and identify the different high-contrast edges, low-contrast edges, surfaces, and textures. Compare those areas with the ELA results. If there are significant differences, then it identifies suspicious areas that may have been digitally altered. (emphases added)
As the author emphasizes, “[s]imilar textures should have similar coloring under ELA,” and “all flat surfaces should have about the same coloring under ELA.” The fotoforensics.com webmaster further explains on his blog The Hacker Factor:
With ELA, you want to compare similar attributes with similar attributes. Each of these areas (surfaces, edges, and textures) may compress at different rates. But in general, all similar surfaces should compress at the same rate. Edges should compress at the same rate as similar edges, and textures should compress at the same rate as similar textures.
When a picture is edited, the modified areas are likely at a different compression level than the rest of the picture.
The following is a forensic image that resulted when employing ELA to the widely-circulated photo of South Carolina Church massacre gunman Dylann Storm Roof wearing his jacket with the historic patches denoting Africa’s colonial past:
Roof_Apartheid_Flags
Image Credit: Facebook
Roof_ELA_Analysis
http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=29642b707d52f525b2ef8748761418651465c582.87289&show=ela
ELA reveals areas where the patches appear that suggest a differing compression speed and thus possible manipulation. In other words, the Apartheid-era patches attributed to Roof may have been digitally inserted into the above image to accentuate the narrative of Roof’s racist motivations in the tragic slayings.
In an era of mass illusion where digital representations can be so easily and convincingly altered to accommodate or bolster a specific story line, the importance of such analysis cannot be understated. Like the Sandy Hook School shootings, the Charleston Church massacre represents an emotionally potent and divisive powder keg, especially because it is positioned to draw on conflicting sets of socio-cultural experience, identity, and history.
Yet through individual images such as the above perhaps a larger picture can be discerned. As with Sandy Hook, the June 17 event will be used as a rationale for a raft of government agendas long sought after with the express purpose of “keeping the public safe.” Such programs can be judiciously considered only after the tremendous government and media-fueled wave of fear and alarm has passed–indeed, only after the American public knows what really happened.
Die Oklahoma bom deur Timothy MacVeigh uit weerwraak vir die Wacho slagting 2 jaar vantevore.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh
Iets soortgelyks is hoegenaamd nie onmoontlik in SA nie veral as ‘n Christenskool of afrikaner nedersetting / plakkerskamp aangeval sou word onder aanhitsing van die anti-gotters en Naspers.
Ek sal nie verbaas wees as Genl Viljoen ook die skrif aan die muur sien nie.
Want daar is dinge in die lewe wat erger is as die dood hier in Tsafendastan se Pratt-Park aan die ontwikkel – ouens raak sielkundig al meer onstabiel…
Effexor is die antidepressant medisyne wat onder verdenking is vir moord gedagtes van die ander massamoorde in die VSA.
Ek sou dink dis politieke partye wat voorgee hulle verteenwoordig Afrikaner- en Blanke belange in die land om op “georganiseerde wyse” (wil nie waag om te skryf wat “georganiseerd” sal wees nie), ‘n nota aan die Amerikaanse ambassadeur in ons land af te lewer waarin hulle dringend versoek dat die klaarblyklik verdagte “bewysstukke” wat deur die Amerikaanse ondersoekers van die beweerde misdaad die wêreld ingestuur is te verduidelik, veral in die lig van die Swart op Wit-haatmisdaad in ons land wat enige dag kan ontaard in grootskeepse volksmoord. En wat van klagskrifte aan Amenestie Internasionaal en die VN?
Die manifes het dieselfde soort klank as die Dagboek van Anne Frank of die Protocols of the elders of Zion.
Dis interessant om te sien hoe hard hulle probeer om Roof se optrede om ons nek te hang, byna soos hulle die vlae om sy nek gehang het. Soos Dr Roodt sê, die aandag moet ten alle koste van swart barbarisme afgelei word en ons is, soos gewoonlik, die sondebok. Op die vraag wat in die opskrif bo gestel word, is die antwoord: “waarskynlik nie”;
http://www.cut2thetruth.com/charlestonfalseflag.html Charleston Shooting: Typical American Psyop: Nog ‘n webwerf wat ontledings oor CIA-bedrywighede doen, goed skepties ingestel, maar gewoonlik tog informatief.
Sien ook hierdie: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/06/charleston-cognitive-psychology-and-media-influence/#more-28451
Hi “Waarnemer” … jy besef seker dat jy reeds die perk oorskry het, en nou ‘n ‘kommentator’ is. http://praag.co.za/?p=7963
Welkom hier!
Dankie vir die verwelkoming! More is ek terug in die soutmyn, dan is die voorreg van kommentator wees verby. Maar die ondervinding was goed!
“More is ek terug in die soutmyn …”
Hier op praag myn ons nie vir sout nie … maar vir waarheid.
Daar was intussen nog skietery op skares in die VSA volgens die radionuus.
Natuurlik geen nuus van die rasse nie….
Weet julle iets?
Russia Today:At least seven people, including a two-year-old and eleven-year-old child, were injured in West Philadelphia after a shotgun-wielding attacker fired into a street picnic, local police said. The children were hospitalized in critical condition.
The report comes almost simultaneously with news from a block party in Detroit, where one person was killed and 9 injured in a shooting on the same Saturday evening.
It was not immediately clear why the West Philadelphia shooter targeted the block party on Ogden Street, according to local police.
“It looks like they just randomly fired down the street and hit anyone in their way,” NBC 10 Philadelphia quoted Philadelphia Police Lt. John Walker.
The agency added that a shotgun was used to fire at the victims, which included children.
An 18-month-old girl was rushed to Philadelphia’s Children’s Hospital with a neck wound, while another girl, aged 11, was struck in the knee, and a boy, aged 13, took a shot to the shoulder.
Hospitalized in critical condition, the children were all listed as stable, according to the latest update by CBS Philly.
Police later listed the ages of the rest of the victims as 22, 26, 26 and 46. The 26-year-old, a man, was shot multiple times and his condition was unknown.
No arrests have yet been made in connection with the shooting, but investigators believe the gunman was not attending the party at any time during the night.
Police officers described the crime scene as extremely chaotic and a “terrible situation,” with people frantically trying to help the injured baby girl as heavy rain began to pour.
The first suspect is described as a black male in his 20’s with a light complexion, neck beard and tattoos on one arm. He was wearing a yellow t-shirt and blue jeans.
The second suspect is described as a black male with a dark complexion wearing dark blue jeans and a black shirt.
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/breaking/Ogden-STreet-Shooting-308747231.html#ixzz3diSZiFLC
No flags?! Looks like a sloppy CIA job.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=50&v=ny37AcUDqQE
The merchant of death George Soros, “Open Society” monger and King of the Left, believes European civilization should be destroyed by unrestricted mass immigration from the third world. He wants to work with China: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2015/jul/09/partnership-china-avoid-world-war/
Dit glo ek want China is nog goedkoper arbeid as wat die swartes gewees het.
Dit is dat Sjina beheer was deur die jode toe Mao aan bewind gekom het. Die jode, dit was ‘n sekere Cohen wat die toutjies getrek het en Mao het gemaak soos hy se. Sjina is nog steeds kommunisties, al het hy sy ekonomie beleid verander. Sy hele ekonomie is ‘n “gemors ekonomie” want al wat hulle vervaardig is goedkoop gemors wat uiteindelik op die ashoop beland en die wereld besoedel.
‘n Jood, Herman Kallenbach, na bewering in ‘n ongewenste verhouding met Mahatma Ghandi, kon net sowel Gandhi se politieke doen en late beheer het:.
A state in western India has banned Pulitzer-prize-winning Joseph Lelyveld’s new book about Mahatma Gandhi after reviews said it hints that the father of India’s independence had a homosexual relationship.
More bans have been proposed in India, where homosexuality was illegal until 2009 and still carries social stigma.
Gujarat’s state assembly voted unanimously on Wednesday to ban Joseph Lelyveld: Great Soul: Mahatma Gandhi and His Struggle With India.
The furore was sparked by local media reports, based on early reviews in the US and UK, some of which emphasised passages in the book that suggested Gandhi had an intimate relationship with a German man named Hermann Kallenbach.
The book has not yet been released in India.
Lelyveld has said his work was taken out of context. “I do not allege that Gandhi is a racist or bisexual in Great Soul,” he told the Times of India. “The word ‘bisexual’ nowhere appears in the book.”
However, several reviews of Great Soul detailed its sections on Gandhi’s relationship with Kallenbach.
Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Andrew Roberts said the only portrait on the mantelpiece opposite Gandhi’s bed was of Kallenbach.
“How completely you have taken possession of my body,” reads one widely quoted letter from Gandhi to Kallenbach. “This is slavery with a vengeance.”
Britain’s Daily Mail ran an article under the headline: “Gandhi ‘left his wife to live with a male lover’ new book claims”.
The Mumbai Mirror on Tuesday ran a front-page story under the headline: “Book claims German man was Gandhi’s secret love”, which quoted the same passages as Roberts.
Sudhir Kakar, a psychoanalyst who has written about Gandhi’s sexuality and reviewed some of his correspondence with Kallenbach, said he did not believe the two men were lovers. “It is quite a wrong interpretation,” he said.
Gandhi’s great goals were non-violence, celibacy and truth, he said.
“The Hindu idea is that sexuality has this elemental energy which gets dissipated,” Kakar said. “If it can be sublimated and contained it can give you spiritual power. Gandhi felt his political power really came from his celibacy, from his spiritual power.”
Nou weet ons waarom Putin ‘n Lasbrief vir Soros se inhegtenis neming uitgereik het.
Jy slaat die spyker op die kop. Mossad/CIA weer aan die werk. Soek die lyke na die hele gedoente en dit is skoonveld, nes die Sandy Hook gedoente. Selfs die Boston Marathon storie begin verdag lyk.
Charleston announces a race war on whites: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_o-rzGRSu8s
Dra die bafoere nou sonbrille in die nag in Charleston? Eisj!
Hehe, hier by ons dra hulle dit mos in ‘n vertrek, dag of nag. Dalk om die aandag af te trek van die groot neusgate …
Ek merk dat plaaslik na Roof as die wit wolf verwys word en natuurlik is daar verwysings na apartheid. Duidelik wil iemand nou weer die wit Suid Afrikaners in ‘n swak lig stel, en sulke insidente sal natuurlik ‘n wit volksmoord regverdig. Dit wil voorkom of ons moet begin loopgrawe graaf – die aanslag word al hoe feller
PROFETIES GESPROKE is die satan vanaf 1994 in beheer, en kinders van die Duisternis is mos sy kinders.. . . . . DUS?