praag.co.za

Israel, Saoedi-Arabië beplan aanval op Iran

Written by

Karin Roodt

in

,

israelsaudIsrael is besig met die koördinering van planne vir ‘n militêre aanval op Iran. Hulle werk saam met Saoedi-Arabië.

Riyadh sal taktiese ondersteuning bied aan Jerusalem, het ‘n Britse koerant berig vroeg Sondag.

Saterdag het Bibi Netanyahu aan die Franse dagblad Le Figaro oor die situasie verklaar dat Israel en die “voorste lande in die Arabiese wêreld ” saamstem wanneer dit kom by Teheran en sy kernvermoëns.

“Ons almal dink dat Iran nie toegelaat moet word om die kapasiteit te hê om kernwapens te maak nie,” het hy gesê. “Ons glo dat as Iran was kernwapens bekom, dit kan lei tot ‘n kernwedloop in die Midde-Ooste, en sal die die Midde-Ooste in ‘n kernkruitvat verander.”

Volgens die Sunday Times, het Riyadh ingestem om Israel toe te laat om sy lugruim in ‘n militêre aanval op Iran te gebruik en saam te werk oor die gebruik van reddingshelikopters, brandstofvliegtuie en onbemande tuie.

“Die Saudies is woedend en bereid om aan Israel al die hulp wat hulle nodig het te gee,” het ‘n anonieme diplomatieke bron aan die koerant gesê .

Die verslag kom te midde van Netanyahu se blitsbesoeke om steun te probeer werf teen ‘n internasionale alliansie wat sal toelaat dat Iran uraan sal verryk.

Iran het egter herhaaldelik gesê dat hulle nie belangstel in kernwapens nie.

As die eerste minister van Israel, het hy beklemtoon, moet hy sorg vir “die oorlewing van my land”.

CNN berig dat Netanyahu ook gesê het in die onderhoud dat hy sal doen wat dit nodig is om te doen om Israel te beskerm.

Indien ‘n ooreenkoms bereik word by gesprekke wat in Genève Woensdag hervat, volgens die Israeliese diplomatieke bron, is ‘n militêre opsie terug op die tafel.

Saoedi-Arabië se taktiese ondersteuning, in plaas van rugsteun van die Pentagon, sal deurslaggewend wees vir ‘n langafstand aanval op Iran se kernprogram .

 

Comments

142 responses to “Israel, Saoedi-Arabië beplan aanval op Iran”

  1. jacobmouw Avatar
    jacobmouw

    In 2005 wou Israel vir Iran bombardeer saam met die VSA. Toe George Bush weier, het Ariel Sharon ‘n beroerte gekry.
    Nou sal Saudi-Arabie eers toestemming by China moet verkry, anders gaan hulle daardie olie-klient verloor.

  2. Arkan Avatar
    Arkan

    Israel & Saudi Arabia are two heads of the same monster being controlled by the house of Manase-(USA)

  3. De Juur Avatar
    De Juur

    Rusland en China sal nie ten gunste wees van so ‘n aanval nie. Putin het nie verniet onlangs reuse kernaanval -oefeninge (drills) uitgevoer nie. Putin is gereed vir kern oorlogvoering.
    .
    Almal weet dat Israel oor sowat 200 kernbomme besit en dat hulle dit met hulle Jericho-III interkontinentale missiele kan aflewer. Indien hulle met hierdie aanval op Iran voortgaan is die kanse vir ‘n volskaalse (kern) wêreldoorlog baie hoog.
    .
    Beide Rusland en China het groot beleggings & belange in Iran en daar word sterk getwyfel dat Rusland en China so ‘n eensydige en aggressiewe aanval sal duld.
    .
    Agter die skerms is dit eintlik die (Oorlogsugtige Internasionale Geldmag & Joodse Bankiers in die) VSA wat hierdie hele scenario mooi voor-uit beplan het… en omdat die VSA al te veel kere teen lande oorlog gemaak het, besef hulle dat hulle nie hierdie keer wéér openlik by ‘n nuwe konflik kan betrokke raak nie. Daarom het hulle dit in die geheim so beplan dat dit moet lyk as of dit slegs Israel en Saudi Arabia is wat tot die aanval op Iran wil oorgaan.

    1. eduard Avatar
      eduard

      Op die einde van die dag is Jakob(Israel) teen Esau(Edom). Dit sal maar weer soos in die eerste en tweede wereld oorloe wees waar die blanke westerse nasies gebruik word om die vuil werk te doen. Albert Pike het dit uitgele in sy beplanning van die drie wereld oorloe. Die jode wil ten alle koste die westerse blankedom (kaukasier) uitroei. Edom moet van Israel onstlae raak om sy wereldheerskappy te vervolmaak. Ander lande/volkere is maar net toeskouers in hierdie makabere dramaspel.

  4. Klaus Avatar
    Klaus

    source of
    our present dilemma

    We Fought on the Wrong Side

    by MATT
    KOEHL

    IT HAS
    NOW BEEN 50
    years since the end of World War II. For many that conflict seems like so much
    ancient history. But the anniversary ceremonies and revelry of the military
    victors at this time remind us that there are those who will not soon let us
    forget.

    And so it
    is fair to ask: Why did we — the peoples of America, Canada, England, France,
    Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and all the other white nations — go to
    war in the first place?

    Many
    explanations have been offered: It was to stop dictatorship and aggression, to
    preserve Freedom & Democracy, to save the British Empire, to save little
    countries, etc., etc. When the filter of simple truth is applied, however,
    everything boils down to a single issue: the pathological desire of certain
    interested parties to destroy Adolf Hitler and his Idea. In other words, World
    War II was nothing more than a war against Hitler.

    The Unholy Alliance

    In this
    war, all the various interested parties — Bolsheviks, international bankers,
    reactionaries of all kinds, but especially Jews — discovered that whatever
    differences they had paled in comparison to their common interest in destroying
    this man and his Cause.

    Clad in a
    cloak of sanctimonious pretense, this unholy alliance promised that without
    Hitler there would be a better world — a world of freedom and democracy, a
    world without fear and want, in which Good would triumph over Evil.

    Just how
    sincere their pronouncements were can best be judged by all the rape, pillage,
    ethnic cleansing, torture, kangaroo courts, show trials and the slaughter
    of millions throughout Europe which took place following
    “liberation.”

    What kind of world did the Allied victors give us?

    So what
    kind of world did the victors of 1945 actually give us? Take a good look. For
    over [six decades], they have had an opportunity to show us their world
    without Hitler. What kind of world is it?

    For
    starters, they have given us an endless series of conflicts, [from the Korean
    and Vietnam wars up to the current blood-letting in Iraq and Afghanistan], in
    which countless tens of thousands of lives have been wantonly wasted. They also
    gave us the Cold War, of course, with its massive expenditure and squandering
    of resources, for which we are still paying.

    They gave
    us a world of staggering debt, rat-race consumerism, self-fixation,
    environmental devastation, pollution and race-mixing. They altered the national
    demography and introduced us to the joys of integration, busing, Affirmative
    Action, minority quotas, sensitivity training, Black History and — The Holocaust®.

    Hitler was opposed to all of this

    They gave
    us permissiveness, drugs, MTV and teen suicide. They gave us safe sex and
    unsafe streets and gun control. They gave us rock ‘n’ roll and rape-counseling
    centers. They gave us “alternative lifestyles,” sodomy, AIDS, filth,
    perversion, chaos, crime, corruption, dumbing down and insanity of every kind.

    This is
    the kind of world the military victors of World War II have given us, and it
    constitutes an appalling indictment!

    In no way
    can we blame Hitler for this world. He was absolutely opposed to all of this,
    and he fought

    and sacrificed everything to prevent just such a world.

    But the
    victors of 1945 fought to destroy this man, so that they could bring about their
    world — which is what we now have. This is what they created in World
    War II, and for this they must be held accountable.

    1945 was a defining moment

    The year
    1945 was a defining moment, a watershed in history — the last great
    victory of the Old Order — which determined the kind of world we have
    today. Everything that is now taking place about the globe is causally
    linked to the outcome of that great conflict which took place more than a
    half century ago.

    This
    causal relationship is the underriding reality behind our present condition.
    And this condition can never be altered until that fact is generally
    recognized and we have come to grips with it.

    In
    reassessing our participation in the Second World War, we can come to but one
    conclusion: We fought on the wrong side. And the willingness to admit
    this simple fact is the necessary first step for any national or racial
    recovery.

    The fight goes on!

    Back in
    1959 there was a man who did have the courage to recognize this fact, a man who
    came to realize that we had fought on the wrong side against Adolf Hitler in
    World War II. His name was George Lincoln Rockwell.
    He was a decorated former Navy officer. And exactly 40 years after the Führer
    first raised the Banner, this great apostle was to raise the fallen standard
    anew. It is an example for all of us.

    Although
    a military phase of National Socialist struggle ended in 1945, the war declared
    by world Jewry against Hitler in 1933 has not come to an end. Today this enemy
    — in the pathological pursuit of its Messianic designs — continues to wage war
    against the Leader.

    And so the fight is joined.
    And this time we have an opportunity to be on the right side in this
    ongoing war. And instead of fighting against Hitler, we can now fight with
    him and for his New Order. No greater honor or privilege can one ever have.

    THEY WERE
    SACRIFICED ON THE ALTAR OF ZION — Not too many Stars of David can be
    seen amidst the deathly quiet of these Stygian rows.

    Wednesday,
    8 May 2013

    1. eduard Avatar
      eduard

      Spot on! “There will be no peace on this planet until every jewe is wiped off the face of the earth” – American Politician.

      1. Arkan Avatar
        Arkan

        Its strange that american politicians (House of manase),are the ones today who enforce the zionists demands & not Rome,Greece,Russia etc.

        1. Evita Peron Avatar
          Evita Peron

          Very True,so much for anti Rome Propaganda.
          you cant beat that for facts,Arkan.

    2. Arkan Avatar
      Arkan

      Remember there were many christian countries who were not part of the second world war.
      Spain was one such country.
      Franco met with Adolf numerously,but warned Hitler,he would not tolerate “nazi totalitarianism” in his country.
      The world you speak of above, sounds about right,oh yes.

      But these individuals you blame are riddled in Calvinistic/protestant countries.
      Most of these countries have never displayed anti semitism…if anything,a refuge rather.
      Rome,Spanish inquisition,Tartars (Russia),Greece,Venice etc are represent a large right who never fell to such low levels.

      You guys have got to start cleaning shop…or history will leave you Geneavans/Bohemians behind.

      1. Martin Avatar
        Martin

        There is a lot of irony in the world. We have “christians” fighting for the Farisees’ kingdom, and we have “protestants” calling Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation, an anti-semite.

      2. Martin Avatar
        Martin

        You forget that Russia fought for the Jews in WW2 against the “anti-semite” germans..

        1. Arkan Avatar
          Arkan

          Communism was invented by jews in Russia,so naturally they would fight for the jews.
          Things have since changed however.

    3. Einad Snetraam. Avatar
      Einad Snetraam.

      All very well looking at the outcome in retrospect. Now kindly enlighten me as to how your post-war world would have looked like had Hitler won the war? I suppose his dillusional syphilitic way of thought was just a precursor to go the Full Monty – id est A I D S? ( But hey, blame that on the Zionists as well….now that you’re at it. )

      1. Riempies Avatar
        Riempies

        With my blue eyes and very fair skin? ——- in the pondseats 😉

        1. Einad Snetraam. Avatar
          Einad Snetraam.

          In the pond is where thee belong. The Jews however, always in the pound seats. Blue eyes and fair skin make for bad spelling…..it seems.

          1. Riempies Avatar
            Riempies

            Could it be that you misinterpreted the spelling?
            Once a teacher always teacher 😉

      2. Klaus Avatar
        Klaus

        You must be the original Zionist zombie!

      3. Gas Avatar
        Gas

        Probeer fanagalo ou. Jou Engels is net so swak as jou Afrikaans.

  5. Dave Avatar
    Dave

    In die laaste dae sal lande wat teen Israel optrek om hulle te vernietig, hulle klaaglik misgis. Ps. 83:4,5,6 “Teen u volk smee hulle listig ’n plan en hou onder mekaar raad teen u verborgenes.Hulle sê: Kom, laat ons hulle vernietig, dat hulle geen volk meer is nie, sodat aan die naam van Israel nie meer gedink word nie. Want hulle het van harte saam raad gehou; teen U sluit hulle ’n verbond”
    Lees verder in die Psalm wat sal word met die mense wat saamspan om Israel in die laaste dae te verdelg.

    1. kees Avatar
      kees

      Ek volg jou gedagtegang.. Iran is na wie daar verwys word as “Israel” in die Psalm.. en dat die vyande van Christus (Zioniste) teen hierdie “Israel” optrek om dit te vernietig…

      1. african4 Avatar
        african4

        Boggom, toe nie. Iranese is die Babiloniers van die Bybel se tyd.

        1. kees Avatar
          kees

          Ek het dit weer dat Babilon die plek is waar Mammon ontstaan het, die uitleen van goud teen rente, die woeker-sisteem. Snaaks ek sien nie juis Iranese aan die stuur van sentrale-banke, of die bankwese in geheel nie. Vat bv. die Resewebank van SA en die Fed van die VSA.. ag man, die nasie is so op die punt van my tong.. boggem-boggem

    2. Klaus Avatar
      Klaus

      Die Ou Testament is bloot tatale plagiaat vd ou Sumeriese en Egiptiese hoe beskawings se MITES. Die sg “Israelite” het nooit enige werklike beskawing gehad nie. Die Jode was deur die eeue heen bloot oppurnistiese parasiete wat op Westerse beskawings geteer het. Lees bv “THE BIBLE UNEARTHED” deur Finkelstein & Kie. Wat jy aanhaal is blote mitilogiese snert!

    3. 12345 Avatar
      12345

      What happened to the good old days when the Christian churches were anti-semitic? Christ was the first anti-Semite. True Christians reject Jews and Judaism.

      1. Arkan Avatar
        Arkan

        Now they represent christian countries governments & fight their wars.

        1. 12345 Avatar
          12345

          Christian Zionism is a big problem in the conservative white community all over the world. It’s one of the biggest accomplishments of world Jewry – turning the churches who previously rejected them, into their biggest supporters.

          1. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            I never see Rome/Greek/Russian rite,supporting them.

          2. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            The tiff is new. Previously they were as thick as thieves in SA. Remember Regina Mundi? The Anglicans provide the glue

          3. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            No,these tiffs are nothing new infact,this is an untruth.
            Who surrounded the jews at Masada – Rome.
            Who deported them from W-Europe – Spain & Portugal.
            Byzantium also taxed them heavily,as did Venice.
            Who destroyed the Ottoman Empire – The holy league under John of Austria & Spain.(Battle of Lepanto)

            How far back do you want me to go,Guest?

          4. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            There is truth to what you say.. but remember in order to deport the jews, they had to be allowed first. My point is it takes time to realize a people’s true nature and intentions. Martin Luther wrote “the Jews and their lies” near the end of his life where he advocated deportation. Protestantism is not as old as Rome. So if your implying there is something fundamentally wrong with protestantism, I think you are mistaken. It has definitely been a vehicle used.

            How the protestants got to embracing the jewish cause so much is something that puzzles me.. I mean, did they not read what Luther said. Money must have played a big role.. I think Calvin also had a hand in it..

          5. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            Being allowed to deport these individuals is based on public opinion & interests.If there is no will there is NO way.
            Protestantism is aiding & abetting these individuals.
            You say it puzzles you,it should not.

            The link was the kingdom of Bohemia,where Jews & protestants lived side by side.
            They were deported from all other kingdoms both Rome & Greek/Russian.
            WWII also played a role as did the Spanish inquisition & other anti semetic moves in history throughout the greek/russian empire..
            There are many books that cover this period in history.

            I ask you,who owns the worlds minerals & in which countries are they based?
            Who backs these cartels & enforces their aims:
            Protestants.
            These are facts.

          6. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            I am a protestant and I don’t aid and abet the Jews. In fact, I am from the Boers, and we are protestants, yet UK protestants came with force and took our country and minerals, like you said. Why did we not just give it all to the UK protestants since we are such good friends like you imply?

          7. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            Beware of these long “historical” rants. It’s a ploy to cover inaccurate detail. I find the recent debate in the US about JFK very interesting. Kennedy’s death was welcomed with relief in Tel-Aviv, for it meant the end of Kennedy’s pressure on Israel to comply with UN Resolution 194 for the Palestinians’ right of return, and to renounce building its own nuclear arsenal. No president, in fact, ever attempted seriously to stop Israel from building weapons of mass destruction since Kennedy. Consider the fact that, after firing Allen Dulles who had tricked him into the Bay of Pigs fiasco, Kennedy had appointed as director of the CIA, John McCone, who had been Eisenhower’s chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). McCone was responsible for having leaked the story of Israel’s lies regarding the true military nature of its Dimona project, to reporter John Finney of the New York Times, who published it on December 19, 1960, weeks before Kennedy was to take office. As Alan Hart writes, “there can be no doubt that Kennedy’s determination to stop Israel developing its own nuclear bomb was the prime factor in his decision to appoint McCone.” In 1965, McCone resigned after having failed to get Johnson interested in that matter.

          8. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            & kennedy was a catholic,a child of Rome…or do you forget that?

          9. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            And Verwoerd was a Protestant, or do you forget that?

          10. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            True,but the house is divided…unlike Rome (holy League & Greek/Russian rite).
            Trust is null & void amongst Protestants.
            Geneva,USA,UK,Holland,Germany makes the rules not Verwoerd.

          11. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            Yitzhak Rabin was a Jew. He was in Dallas “hours before” Kennedy’s death, a “mere coincidence” revealed by his wife in her biography.

          12. Evita Peron Avatar
            Evita Peron

            Now Rham emmanuel is Obamas aid & every president before & after JFK has been a protestant.

          13. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            He’s not responsible for the script. The Catholics also have a history of being dupicitous. Read up on the Conversos or Marranos

          14. Evita Peron Avatar
            Evita Peron

            Rome has always fought these scumbags.They have not been looting the worlds minerals with their buddies,neither has Russian/greek rite.
            It seems many are missing the big picture here.
            We surrounded Masada,nobody else.

          15. eduard Avatar
            eduard

            Google The Black Pope. He rules the Jesuits, he is more evil than the devil himself. He has more power than the Pope. He creates more trouble than we can ever imagine. It is not a secret that the Rothschilds controls the Vatican’s finances.

          16. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            This is blatant propaganda.France,America & Uk do Rothschilds dirty work ,not Rome.
            Rome did not bomb serbia for 79 days running but UK indicted me,UN bombed us from my part of the world & tried us in den haagen.

          17. Klaus Avatar
            Klaus

            What about the Warburgs, the Rockefellers, the House of Morgan – and of course the Oppenheimers?

          18. Klaus Avatar
            Klaus

            And the Van Der Bilts of course.

          19. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            That guy was dutch american/or jewish.
            House of manase.USA

          20. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            What does this have to do with me?
            these people operate in protestant countries.
            What about them..?

          21. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            Russians only recently kicked out the jewish oilgarchs under Putin..

          22. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            Yes,although prior to communism there were many pogroms historically.
            Remember,that Russia was founded by Greece.

          23. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            They also presented the German Pope with a full dossier of child molesters linked to the Church. The Protestants are not divided because they are God-less. The Catholics are divided, but the Argentinian will heal the rift. He is busy

          24. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            There are also dossiers of child rapists operating out of many churches.
            The cape flats is full up…
            Germany is not a strong Catholic country,rather Austria.

          25. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            True, I meant as in the language, not the soil.

          26. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            But the language Yiddish has its origins in german.
            Not so..?

          27. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            The battle to save it will be tough

          28. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            This is a fight that the Greek/Russian rite & Rome can not fight for the Protestants.
            Its their mess,they have to stand up,we stood up ages ago.

            That’s why all these countries are today weak financially,but the protestant ones who favour the ashkenazis are wealthy.
            Does Rothschild not reside in France?

          29. Evita Peron Avatar
            Evita Peron

            Arkan,I want to present to you an example of Protestant propaganda in the book: “Destroy the spirit of Ubuntu…said the white christian boss”
            In section A: The dogs of Christianity Pg.10 it says “These same cruel christian murderers were the same people who virtually annihalated the entire indigenous people of America & Australia,the Indians & the Abbos.

            This is another untruth,these “people”,where killed by the English Protestants.
            These countries were not settled by Rome.
            not with names like New york,Wyoming,Adelaide & perth.

          30. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            True.

          31. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            The same people who put Nelson Mandela in office, obviously. This was the trial run. They sold a faulty version to the US. Perhaps intentionally

          32. Evita Peron Avatar
            Evita Peron

            I agree with you but this is happening in Protestant counties.
            Mandela was put in the chair under protestant rule with the help of others.

          33. Rooikop Avatar
            Rooikop

            Daar is soveel teorieë oor hoekom Kennedy vermoor is. Hy het ‘n klomp mense die harnas ingejaag met van die hervormings wat hy voorgestaan het – Hy was ‘n katoliek, hoewel hy verlangse familiebande met die mafia gehad het, het hy hulle aanbande gelê, verder het hy blykbaar die Nazis die harnas in gejaag as deel van VSA se “operation paperclip”. Hy wou ook die FED aan bande lê – nou was die jode ook kwaad vir hom.

            Met soveel vyande g’n wonder sy doppie is geklink nie.

          34. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            Most of what you refer to are inaccuracies, perhaps willful error, as you can see from the following quote: “There is a question about whether the father of JFK did not inject some poisonous drops of anti-Semitism in the minds of his children, including his son John’s”, had wondered publicly Menachem Begin’s party Herut. LBJ’s campaign for a Senate seat in 1948 was masterminded by Abraham Feinberg, the financial godfather of Israel’s atomic bomb.

          35. Rooikop Avatar
            Rooikop

            My punt is daar is soveel stories oor wat hier gebeur het dat dit moeilik is om tussen feit en liegstorie te onderskei.
            Heelwaarskynlik is ten minste een of dalk almal gedeeltelik waar – ek sal nie weet nie.

          36. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            In the US we have a fair idea

          37. Evita Peron Avatar
            Evita Peron

            The US are going to collapse & be drained of their funds.
            Spain went the same way under the Habsburg House.

            If that does not happen first,they should remember the Latin empire are just over their border & are entering daily.

            Once the Latin population swell in USA it will be time for the white house to represent its NEW citizens.
            Opus Dei is just waiting in the wings in USA….
            Will Israel receive such support then ?
            They will have to use Germany & UK to fight their battles.

          38. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xn2riv_cia-et-lsd-a-pont-saint-esprit-en-1951_webcam

          39. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            The Germans have the richest Catholics, but they just lost their Pope

          40. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            You mean the Austrians…

          41. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            Cologne has the richest Catholic congregation

          42. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            Cologne is one city & there may be others.
            Germany is Calvinist/protestant.
            correction,there is only one Pope,no German pope.

          43. eduard Avatar
            eduard

            JFK was uitgehaal omdat hy wou “greenbacks” begin druk en die Rothschilds moes dit ten alle koste vermy.

          44. Rooikop Avatar
            Rooikop

            Dit is soos ek ook die storie het maar lyk my daar mag dalk meer aan wees.

          45. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            Daar is dalk meer as net een rede hoekom hy uitgehaal is. Netso vir Verwoerd.

          46. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            If you feel so much for your protestant religion,why are they aiding & abetting jews all over the world?
            If this is such a wonderful religion,why is there no unity?

          47. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            It’s a strange question. We can just as well ask, why do “christians” aid and abet jews all over the world? Simple answer is, their are “christians” and there are Christians. Similarly you get “protestants” and Protestants. Should we choose another name other than “Christian” just because the majority are hypocrites being led astray by the arch-hypocrites that crucified Christ? Hypocrisy is the problem.

          48. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            Christians ALL OVER are not aiding these individuals.
            These individuals are operating strictly out of present day protestant run countries.

            Which part of this do you not understand?

          49. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            Where were these Christians you talk about when the Boer-Republics were attached by UK Protestants (and Catholics)? Did you want us to convert first before you would help.. was that it?

            From where I’m sitting Judeo-christians lead the christian “house” in your terms.. They go to war and make as they please. No stops them, they just mostly fall over their own feet.

          50. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            There were Russians,Catholics who fought on the boer side during the boer war.
            Do you not know this?

            Most stayed in their own countries,did you help those from other faiths in Iraq,vietnam when Protestants attacked them?
            Do Shiates aid sunnis when USA protestants attack them?

          51. Evita Peron Avatar
            Evita Peron

            Maybe & I am not denergrating your faith at all,but you in SA do not run Protestantism.

          52. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            We know, the British are

          53. Evita Peron Avatar
            Evita Peron

            It is not only the british,although they head the house of Protestantism.
            ~extract from “A remnant will turn/Eendrag maakt magt”

            Hope you have read these books?

          54. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            I have

          55. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            Martin Luther was a Protestant, and he advocated the deportation of Jews from Christian countries. Maybe the faith in Britain, USA, etc. are the ones not conforming to Protestantism?
            We have these jew aiding & abetting protestants (christians) in South Africa.. even among the Boers we have them. They are in all organizations the world over.. as stated in the Protocols.

          56. Evita Peron Avatar
            Evita Peron

            Advocation of an idea & implementation are two separate cups of tea,Martin.

          57. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            Implementation came under Hitler remember. In Russia, implementation came only now with Putin after how many decades.. implementation there is also only halfway anyway. Hitler stood openly against them.

          58. Riempies Avatar
            Riempies

            Was Hitler regtig so irrasioneel? (Het hy maar geslaag). Hy wou drie dinge bereik die Arianras suiwer hou – en die Jode met hulle gemengde bloed uitwis en die wereld beheer/regeer deur n suiwer Arian-bloedlyn.
            Geloof – die langtermyn magtige medium wat hy nie in berekening gebring het nie, asook gulsigheid en
            oorhaastigheid het sy ondergang beteken.

            Veroorsaak oorhaastigheid nie die kelder van die meeste langtermyn projekte – iets wat die NWO – soos dit wil voorkom nog nooit aan gely het nie en sodoende hulle sukses verseker?

            My kommentaar is net n tussenwerpsel – ek geniet julle gesprek baie.

          59. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            Nee, Riempies hy wou hulle nie uitwis nie, dis propaganda. Net hul tentakels uit Duitsland trek, en dalk ‘n voorbeeld wees vir die res van die wereld hoe om so iets te doen en hulself te bevry. Hitler was self nie blond nie, het nie kinders gehad nie en was die hoof leier… maar die propaganda lui.. hy was uit vir homself (gulsig), hy wou suiwer-blonde-ariers kweek en net hulle mag leiers wees. Iets pas nie so mooi nie.

          60. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            Hitler never came right for a number of reasons…

          61. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            Yes, one being that most Russian people fought for their Jews in power rather than side with Hitler and overthrow that stinking bunch.

          62. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            The same cannot be said today,Klaus.
            Communism was invented by zionists,do you not know this?

          63. Klaus Avatar
            Klaus

            Who are you really communicating with? Me or Martin? You seem rather dazed and confused.

          64. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            both

          65. Evita Peron Avatar
            Evita Peron

            Implementation in russia came many years before Putin.
            have you heard of the Tsar,the tartars etc..
            It needs to be a constant implementation otherwise it will fail.

          66. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            Maybe not & yes you did fight them,but YOU & the local Boers, do not lead the protestant “house”.
            In this game,your brothers from your same faith,do not value you,they answer to “others”.

          67. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            Their “faith” is with the Antichrist. So no, we actually don’t share the same faith. Remember both Farisees and Jesus claimed they were on God’s side. The Farisees ruled the synagogues and they had Christ crucified. But we may need another Reformation of sorts within our ranks..

          68. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            The ball is in your court Martin,you have big shoes to fill.
            We achieved the same ages ago.

          69. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            Who do you mean by “we”? If you mean Roman Catholic or Greek Orthodox countries, I really don’t see where you get the “ages ago”.

          70. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            Rome & Greek/Russia cleared their ranks ages ago,now its your turn.

          71. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            What about the Bolsiviks, Stalin, for intance?

          72. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            That is now history.
            It is the same as me saying what about apartheid?

          73. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            The difference is that I don’t use “ages ago”. And what about apartheid.. do you imply there is something wrong about giving different peoples their own countries so they can govern themselves? This is the essence of apartheid.

          74. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            No problems with that.After all I fought to keep my country Serb.
            Unlike your efforts,ours never failed us.
            Belgrade is White Christians,Germany is not.

          75. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            Good for you. I had some Serbian neighbors in Pretoria some time ago. Still I don’t see the “ages ago”.

          76. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            If you dont know ages ago,then you don’t know Russian/Greek/Latin rite history of “riding our ranks”

          77. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            I begin to see where you are coming from when you mean “riding of ranks”. The fact remains Serbia the country is pretty new.

          78. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            Our country is very old in fact.The UN re drew the boundaries,because they knew if they did not,we would.

          79. Guest Avatar
            Guest

            Actually the Russian system under the Soviets were similar to Apartheid. The regions enjoyed a large degree of autonomy and language protection

          80. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            Yes,even people like me kept our language,customs etc
            The zionist/communists knew they would never break us completely.
            When they collapsed,we showed them,what for.

          81. Martin Avatar
            Martin

            Well good luck with the future. Hope we can one day be there where you now are.

          82. eduard Avatar
            eduard

            Who killed the Boers in the Anglo-Boer war? Was it not at the behest of the Rothschilds and their cohorts that the english fought the war against the Boers. The jews wanted the diamond and goldfields and they used the poor dumb sassenachs to do their dirty work, as they did with everything else.

          83. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            100% but the british head the protestant house.
            Which proves they are in bed with one another.
            The boers are not the only ones to suffer this fate,what about Iraq,Vietnam etc etc far many more perished because america,Uk & other protestant countries fought wars for the ashkenazis.

          84. eduard Avatar
            eduard

            Is that kwien Liesbet II nothing but a whore to the Rothschild brigands? It is the elite and the politicians who bow down to the khazars, not the common plebs.

          85. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            The plebs elect their leaders.
            Protestants need to clear their ranks,like Rome & Russia did.

          86. eduard Avatar
            eduard

            The kwien is not elected and the poor plebs are brainwashed. Look at the NSA, one idiot, one vote.

          87. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            The queen traces her linage back to Zedekia & ultimately Abraham according to the protestant manual..

          88. eduard Avatar
            eduard

            Not entirely, she was not even coronated on the Stone of Jacob.

          89. Arkan Avatar
            Arkan

            I speak according to “A remnant will turn”
            Have you read these books?

          90. eduard Avatar
            eduard

            Reg gestel; ou John Hagee is ook dan een van die groot sondebokke wat “Christian Zionism” voorstaan.

    4. eduard Avatar
      eduard

      Israel is ‘n volk, nie ‘n land nie. Daar moet onderskei word tussen Jakob en Esau, Israel en Edom. Dit is die twee pole waaroor die wrywing gaan. Die jode is Edom: “Edom is modern jewry” – Jewish Encyclopedia.

      1. Eric Bornman Avatar
        Eric Bornman

        Dankie euduard, ek het dit ook so.

    5. Einad Snetraam. Avatar
      Einad Snetraam.

      Se Die Prediker. Hierdie retoriek sal u seker op u lippe prewel die aand / dag as die hemelruim gevul word met sigbare stertstrepe van vuurpyl-gedrewe H-bom plofkoppe?
      Punt is. Wie is die dag daar om u profesiee aan te hoor die dag as hul Moedertjie Aarde tref ?

  6. jacques Avatar
    jacques

    Noudat die Obama administrasie eksperimenteer met diplomatieke oplossings teenoor Iran, vind Israel dit self uit geslote. Speel Iran net vir tyd om die bom te bou, terwyl dit Amerika vermaak met ‘n vriendelike gesig?
    Ek is nie verbaas dat Israel sonder VSA ondersteuning nou self werk aan ‘n millitere oplossing nie. Hulle het nie eintlik ‘n keuse nie. Die vraag is net of dit sal werk?

    1. kees Avatar
      kees

      Hulle het ‘n keuse. Hulle kan maniere aanleer, en ander nasies behandel soos hulle self behandel wil word. Maar hulle wil nie, want hulle is mos uitverkore blikskottels, en voel God het hulle die reg gegee om te maak en breek soos hulle wil en die hele aarde (met al die wesens daarop) is hulle besitting. Dat hulle dit self glo kan mens nog verstaan, maar dat hulle dit reggekry het om nie-jode dit te laat glo om daarvoor hul lewens selfs te gegee, gaan my verstand te bowe.

  7. 12345 Avatar
    12345

    Israel & Saudi Arabia – A match made in Semitic hell.

  8. Klaus Avatar
    Klaus

    France
    clueless on Iran

    By Pepe Escobar

    Here is definitive proof – if any was needed – that the Gallic fit-throwing that burned the
    possibility of an interim Iranian nuclear deal last week in Geneva was
    completely pointless.

    The key “concern” expressed by Israel-firster French Foreign Minister
    Laurent Fabius to derail an interim deal was about the Arak heavy-water
    reactor.

    Well, UN inspectors this week reported that they had detected no new
    developments in Arak over the three months since August. [1]

    The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Yukiya Amano, was also
    in Tehran on Monday, and – unusually for his trademark paperboy role for
    Washington – had nothing to complain about.

    Fabius used the Arak gambit at the last minute in Geneva to derail the talks,
    provoking the ire of even fellow European diplomats. That was out of pure
    disinformation; Tehran was already doing what Fabius insisted they were not
    doing.

    A EU diplomat (non-French) confirmed to Asia Times Online that Iranian Foreign
    Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif had already informed US Secretary of State John
    Kerry about these euphemistically defined “confidence-building
    measures”. Kerry was fully aware before he landed in Geneva on his way to
    sign an interim deal.

    But guess what: the French were clueless. Kerry did not tell anybody else on
    the P5+1 table (comprising the United States, Britain, France, China, Russia
    and Germany) because he feared any leaks. This proves once again that this
    infinitely complex negotiation is really between Washington and Tehran. Russia
    and China are behaving – so far – as sort of quiet (and wary) observers. Yet
    Kerry, Francophile that he is, should have know better about Gallic peacock
    instincts.

    Fabius – acting on orders of “popular” (26% and sinking) President
    Francois Hollande – started to pre-emptively torpedo the negotiations even
    before Kerry landed in Geneva. Arak was the perfect pretext to shade France’s
    true agenda; to act as an agent of Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu and to
    secure future fat contracts from those paragons of democracy, the
    Wahhabi-dominated Gulf Counter-revolution Club, aka the Gulf Cooperation
    Council (GCC).

    So Fabius was not only totally clueless about privileged Kerry-Zarif
    information; he felt like a spurned lover (Moliere to the rescue).

    Make no mistake. Kerry – following President Barack Obama’s brief – badly wants
    a deal. But as this is a P5+1 affair, he simply cannot out the French as
    spoilers. Thus the subsequent tactic earlier this week of “blaming”
    Iran – as in “they were not ready for a deal yet”.

    Assorted European diplomats have been spinning, off the record, that yes, there
    was a nearly done deal, but the Iranian delegation still had to go back to
    Tehran to get ultimate approval from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. That’s
    exactly the line that Kerry followed during the week.

    The whole saga restarts next Wednesday. There is no question Iranian President
    Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Zarif made sure the IAEA would be able to
    attest, from inside Iran, that goodwill is still the name of the game. This is
    how they controlled their own opposition – the hard line Revolutionary Guards.

    Heavy water Arak is not the problem. Heavy Gallic posturing is. Let’s see
    whether the Fabius reactor will leak again next week, or whether Kerry will be
    able to contain it.

    Note:

    1. IAEA: Iran has not expanded nuclear facilities in last
    3 months, RT, November 14, 2013.

    1. Arkan Avatar
      Arkan

      Don’t you find it strange that this whole farce was held in “Geneva” ?

      1. Klaus Avatar
        Klaus

        The European Union is basically a Jewish mongrel “state”.

        1. Evita Peron Avatar
          Evita Peron

          Of course,with its HQ in Holland,Antwerp & Geneva.
          Once again which nations are these?

          1. Klaus Avatar
            Klaus

            Actually BRUSSELS!

          2. Evita Peron Avatar
            Evita Peron

            I like you,you make my case,more & more water tight.

        2. Arkan Avatar
          Arkan

          I hope you see who is fast threatening this mongrel Ashkenazi state of the EU…?
          NOT the protestant countries but Spain,Portugal,Italy,Greece etc
          The rest are fine with it because they are benefitting with their buddies in Israel & Geneva.

          The other major Christian rite who is opposed to the EU/trade block is Russia/Greek rite.

          1. Klaus Avatar
            Klaus

            The Jews showed the protestants how to mogrelize ages ago. Where do you think our so-called Coloureds came from?

          2. Einad Snetraam. Avatar
            Einad Snetraam.

            Belgiers, Noorweers, Skandinawiers, Hollangers, Austriers en Duitsers. Eintlik enigeen met n voorliefde om rooi kortsokkies by sandale te dra.
            Daai geelbek snotvis is vir hul totaal onweerstaanbaar.

      2. Evita Peron Avatar
        Evita Peron

        NO,not at all.

  9. DOODLOOPSTRAAT Avatar
    DOODLOOPSTRAAT

    The jew that pissed on Jesus….
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAYvZZmrNAc

  10. Klaus Avatar
    Klaus

    take your
    pick

    Three Definitions of
    ‘Anti-Semitism’

    by JAMES
    HARTING

    THERE ARE
    THREE very
    different definitions of “anti-Semitism”: the standard dictionary
    definition; the National Socialist definition; and the Jewish definition.

    Before
    looking at these three contrasting definitions, one distraction needs to be
    disposed of: anti-Semitism, if it is to have any real meaning at all, refers
    only to Jews, and not to Arabs. I have met White Nationalists from time to
    time, who have told me that they are not anti-Semitic, because they have
    “nothing against the Arabs.” Conversely, one prominent movement
    scholar told me that, “I am a true anti-Semite: I hate both Arabs and Jews
    equally.”

    While it
    is true that both Hebrew and Arabic are part of the Semitic language family,
    anti-Semitism does not refer to linguistics, but to race or ethnicity. No one
    is opposed to either Jews or Arabs based on the origin or structure of their
    indigenous languages: when we use the term “anti-Semitism,” we are
    referring only and specifically to Jews.

    HERE,
    THEN, are
    three definitions of anti-Semitism:

    (1) The
    standard dictionary definition of anti-Semitism is that it means hostility
    towards Jews. I have at hand the Tenth Edition of Merriam Webster’s Collegiate
    Dictionary. Here is the full definition:

    “hostility toward or
    discrimination against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group,” (p.
    52)

    This is
    the definition that most non-Jews use.

    (2) We
    National Socialists, however, have a more penetrating insight into the Jewish
    problem than do the editors down at Merriam Webster. Here is a basic and concise
    NS definition:

    Anti-Semitism is the natural and
    normal defensive reaction of non-Jews to typical Jewish behavior.

    This is
    by no means a complete or comprehensive definition, but it is accurate, from an
    NS standpoint, in so far as it goes.

    (3) The
    Jews themselves, have a very different functional definition of what it means
    to be anti-Semitic (or anti-Jewish or anti-Zionist). For the Jews,
    anti-Semitism consists of opposition to Jewish goals.

    Thus, for
    practical purposes, the Jews define anyone who opposes Jewish goals as a
    functional anti-Semite, whether that person actually dislikes the Jews or not.

    By way of
    example, the Jews consider the National Rifle Association to be an anti-Semitic
    organization, not because it attacks the Jews (it does not), but because it
    opposes the Jewish goal of disarming white Americans. The fact that some Jews
    are NRA members is completely beside the point.

    Or
    consider the case of the great American populist leader Huey P. Long
    (1893-1935). Long, a Democrat, served as US senator from Louisiana and as
    governor of that state. Although in his private beliefs he was undoubedtly a
    white racialist, as were all white Southerners of his day, he did not make
    racialism or anti-Semitism a part of his political approach. In fact, he was
    known as a racial moderate by the prevailing standards.

    Nevertheless,
    he appealed primarily to white workers and farmers. His famous “Share the
    Wealth” program was similar in spirit to the social-economic programs of
    the National Socialists and Fascists in Europe. So although he did not
    criticize the Jews, they felt threatened by him, fearing that he represented
    the beginning of an American fascist upsurge. Further, some members of his
    staff were anti-Semitic (such as Rev. Gerald L. K. Smith), although Long
    himself was not. Long had aspirations to challenge the incumbent president,
    Franklin Delano Roosevelt, known as a great friend of the Jews, in the 1936
    presidential election.

    But it
    was not to be: on September 8, 1935, Huey Long was shot to death in the rotunda
    of the Louisiana state capitol by a Jewish gunman, Carl Weiss. Another
    anti-Semitic threat nipped in the bud!

    As
    paradoxical as it sounds, one can even be pro-Jewish, as in the case of many
    Christian evangelicals, and still be considered by the Jews as an anti-Semite,
    if one opposes Jewish goals. Indeed, the Jews reserve their deepest hatred for
    those who seek to convert them to Christianity, not because these missionaries
    hate the Jews, but because they love them so much!

    THOSE WHO
    OPENLY CRITICIZE the Jews
    fall into a special sub-category of anti-Semite: the Jews refer to such a
    critic as a “blatant anti-Semite,” or, for someone whom they really,
    really fear, as a “Jew-hater.” (Other adjectival intensifiers
    include: “vehement anti-Semite,” “vitriolic anti-Semite,”
    “virulent anti-Semite” and “violent anti-Semite.”)

    For the
    Jews, the opposite of an anti-Semite is a “righteous Gentile.” This
    is a non-Jew who enthusiastically embraces putting Jewish interests and welfare
    before all else, including his own safety and prosperity, and even before that
    of his own kin.

    For Jews,
    there are really only two categories of non-Jews: “anti-Semites”
    (those willing to say “no” to them on occasion); and “righteous goyim”
    (willing slaves).

    So, in
    the eyes of the Jews, those are your only two choices: anti-Semite, or willing
    slave.

    Which of
    the two are YOU?

    James
    Harting is a veteran observer of racial affairs and frequent contributor
    to Stormfront
    online forums.

    Monday,
    11 November 2013

  11. Klaus Avatar
    Klaus

    Our latest book exposing Judaism and the religion of the
    Talmud

    written by a
    Professor of Hebrew and Rabbinic literature!

    The Talmud Tested

    A
    Comparison of the Principles and Doctrines of Modern Judaism with the Religion
    of Moses and the Prophets

    By Alexander
    McCaul

    Professor of
    Hebrew and Rabbinic Literature at Kings College, London

    With an introduction and
    bibliography by Michael Hoffman

    “…unparalleled
    knowledge of Jewish history, religion and Hebrew…the foremost gentile expert
    on Jewish matters.”—John J. Moscrop, Measuring
    Jerusalem

    “An
    apologetic and polemic almost without rival.”
    —Walter Riggans, Biographical Dictionary

    Partial
    list of Contents

    Judaism’s
    perversion of Moses • Rabbinic injustice to women, slaves and gentiles •
    Rabbinic intolerance toward other nations •Hatred in the Talmud contrasted with
    charity in the Bible •Compulsory conversion of gentiles •Judaism’s
    ‘anti-semitic’ attitude toward fellow Jews regarded as am ha’aretz
    •Impoverished Jews whipped for accepting help from Christians •Converts to
    Christianity to be killed •Rabbinic contempt for sons of Noah • Intolerance of
    rabbinic prayers •Rabbinic lies and legends •Judaism a heathen religion:
    astrology, charms and amulets •Excommunication in Judaism •Synagogue system
    based on the oral law •Members of the Sanhedrin had to be skilled in magic
    •Polygamy •Divorce •Judaism’s oppression of the poor •Propaganda techniques and
    tricks of rabbinic deceit •Judaism as moral and intellectual slavery. •Rabbinic
    authority exalted above all others •Jews forbidden to love their gentile
    neighbors •Rabbinic permission to violate God’s commands •The rabbinic criminal
    code • The impenitent Jew at the tribunal of God’s judgment • and much more.

    What
    is unique about this book?

    Alexander
    McCaul reproduces on page after page of this volume, passages from the
    Babylonian Talmud and other sacred rabbinic texts in their original Hebrew and
    Aramaic, and then translates them into English, so there can be no question of
    misquoting, or “taking out of context.” The Talmud Tested offers incontestable
    documentary proof that Judaism leads it followers to mental and spiritual
    bondage in this world and eternal damnation in the next. Michael Hoffman
    writes: “This is the most convincing and comprehensive Christian textbook on
    Judaism since Eisenmenger, and it has the advantage of being in English, in
    clear, modern type. Open-minded persons who study it from cover to cover are
    unlikely to be deceived by the rabbis to any considerable degree ever again.
    Dr. McCaul’s phenomenal scholarship effectively inoculates his readers against
    the epidemic of Talmudic confusion engulfing our nation.”

    A
    Personal Note from Michael Hoffman

    “It
    has long been our objective to publish Alexander McCaul’s masterwork. He was
    the Victorian Eisenmenger (though he sometimes disparaged his German
    predecessor for the often caustic and satirical tone Dr. Eisenmenger adopted;
    Prof. McCaul was sensitive in how he approached potential Judaic converts).
    What is best about the McCaul book, besides being in English, are the numerous
    Hebrew citations printed on many pages and then translated into English, which
    he uses to convict the rabbis, by their own words, of deceit, guile, malice,
    idolatry etc. This edition of The Talmud Tested from Independent History
    and Research represents the clearest and most readable McCaul facsimile on the
    market, and it is supplemented by the new introduction, wherein readers learn
    of the extent to which “Jews” were considered the natural object of missionary
    zeal, when Christianity was still worthy of the name. If thousands of copies of
    this book were to be circulated among Christian leaders and open-minded persons
    of good will, we could see something wonderful develop.”

  12. Deon Avatar
    Deon

    Die Protokolle het in 1877 reeds ‘n 3 wereld-oorlog plan waarna die wereld samelewing sal in stem tot wereld-regering geboekstaaf vir die geheime verligtes/illuminate. Die 3rde en laaste sal die internasionale jodedom (vrymesselaars) die Moslemme teen die Christene afspeel met Iran as die middelpunt. Daarna sal regerings te diep in die skuld wees en kontant sal vervang word met krediete m.a.w geen kontant. Maranatha.

  13. Matt Heyns Avatar
    Matt Heyns

    The launching of Israel at the end of history, a state based on archaic Bible myths, is proving to be mankind’s greatest folly. The Old Testament is now married to high tech weapons. The human specie is threatened with extinction because now the Jews have a state to carry out out their lunatic agenda of world domination. Jewish supremacists have prepared a final option to their madness, when the world finally comes to its senses and rejects the racist warmongering bloody state of Israel they will launch their nuclear option on their western hosts.

  14. Matt Heyns Avatar
    Matt Heyns

    Zionism’s origin is in Bible myths, the myths that float Israel are not only false but bad myths that reward blood lust, murder, mayhem. Everything that Israel is doing is perfectly logical within their mythos, the Jewish holy texts instruct the faithful to kill without remorse. When the Jews wage war they unroll the Torah on the battlefield. Everything Israel does is carefully crosschecked to their scrolls. So how is it that Zionist state is not part of a religious belief system of Judaism? Zionism is the accumulation of a long history of religious exclusionary ideas formed into a political movement.

  15. Matt Heyns Avatar
    Matt Heyns

    As the result of the endless deceptions of the state it was taken over from within by greater deceivers. The Zionists invented the War on Terror which is a deception, it is a War of Terror on you the citizen. America is being destroyed by Zionist deception, Israel is Zion’s headquarters and yet many Americans still love Israel.

    The Zionist ideology is to use the authority of the state to thieve and kill. The modern criminal banking syndicate has led to the permanent warfare state and skullduggery never scene before in world history. As it’s criminal schemes and shady practices are exposed, the world will react and not trust the motives of the empire, its promises, its currency, and bonds.

    The soft underbelly of the empire is its own currency debasement, by continually devaluing the dollar the world will surely not bear its bonds and flee the currency and demand its gold holdings repatriated. This process is well underway, the revolt of other states against the empire’s monetary profligateness.

    The state claims it is defending the homeland America while it bombs Israeli enemies. This has resulted in a complete catastrophe for the US military and it’s morale, it has led to trillions of unpayable debt, it has resulted in America losing all political credibility with its allies, it accelerated the run from the petro dollar and a probable catastrophic end of the over extended military empire.

    Only Israel benefited from 911, America was one of the biggest losers and has suffered huge losses from Jewish treachery yet how many of the military officers are still loyal to Zion? The situation is beyond comprehension, the American people are under the devil’s spell.

    SA het onlangs goud ingevoer vanaf New York en sodoende ons groen handel balans rooi gemaak. Op hierdie manier wil die VSA ekenomies herstel. Uitgeslape skuif.

    1. Arkan Avatar
      Arkan

      This is true.

  16. Matt Heyns Avatar
    Matt Heyns

    What we are seeing is the gradual systematic diminishing of U.S. influence in the Middle East. Whether this is planned by the globalists who control the U.S. or just a consequence of the failed PNAC Bush policies ending with a global recession and the subsequent Obama no plan that caused this loss of influence is actually immaterial. The fact on the ground is that the USA has globally lost it’s leverage while others have gained ground.

    I mean is Washington’s foreign policy completely adrift? Is the current leadership in Washington to blame? Or are we witnessing a paradigm shift in power relations? Is Washington’s influence, particularly in the Middle East, in terminal decline? And, what future can the US carve out in the world in time of incredible geopolitical shifts?

  17. Klaus Avatar
    Klaus

    Scowcroft, Brzezinski urge Iran
    accord

    By Jim Lobe

    WASHINGTON – Two pillars of the US foreign policy establishment urged Congress
    on Monday to forgo any new sanctions legislation directed against Iran, warning
    that it will risk “undermining or even shutting down” ongoing
    negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear program.

    In a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, General Brent Scowcroft
    (retired), who served as national security adviser to Presidents Gerald Ford
    and George H W Bush, and Zbigniew Brzezinski, who served in the same post under
    President Jimmy Carter, said that an interim agreement with Iran – the focus of
    critical talks the next round of which is to begin Wednesday in Geneva –
    “would advance the national security of the United States, Israel, and
    other partners in the region”.

    “More sanctions now as these unprecedented negotiations are just getting
    underway would reconfirm Iranians in their belief that the US is not prepared
    to make any agreement with the current government of Iran,” the two men
    wrote. “We call on all Americans and the US Congress to stand firmly with
    the President in the difficult but historic negotiations with Iran.”

    The letter, which was made available by the New York-based Iran Project, comes
    amidst an increasingly strident campaign by the government of Israeli Prime
    Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his supporters in the powerful Israel lobby
    here to oppose an interim accord that reportedly would permit Tehran to
    continue enriching uranium, albeit at a low level that would not lend itself to
    the production of a nuclear weapon.

    Since negotiators from the so-called P5+1 (the US, Britain, France, Russia,
    China plus Germany) and Iran came within a hair’s breadth of concluding such an
    accord at the last round of talks in Geneva earlier this month, Netanyahu has
    repeatedly denounced it as a “very bad deal,” while other Israeli
    officials have suggested it could lead to their taking unilateral military
    action against Tehran’s nuclear facilities.

    “We are not bluffing. We are very serious – preparing ourselves for the
    possibility that Israel will have to defend itself by itself,” Israel’s
    outgoing national security chief told Monday’s edition of the Financial Times.

    ” … If you ask about [Netanyahu] personally as a prime minister, he is
    ready to take such decisions,” he added noting Israel’s opposition to any
    accord that does not result in the complete dismantling of Iran’s nuclear
    program, including its uranium enrichment.

    Secretary of State John Kerry, European Union (EU) foreign policy chief
    Catherine Ashton, and Iran’s foreign minister, Mohammed Javad Zarif, reportedly
    reached agreement on a draft accord.

    Among other provisions, it requires Iran to freeze the installation of new
    centrifuges in its two enrichment plants; halt production of 20%-enriched uranium;
    and convert most of its 20% stockpile to fuel rods or other forms that reduce
    the possibility it could be used for making a weapon – all overseen by enhanced
    inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency.

    In return, the P5+1 would ease some of the sanctions that have inflicted
    serious damage on Iran’s economy, although Kerry has insisted that core
    financial and oil sanctions would remain in place pending Iran’s compliance and
    a more comprehensive agreement to be negotiated over the next six months to a
    year.

    But the 11th-hour intervention by French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, who
    reportedly objected to language regarding Iran’s claims to a legal right to
    enrichment, as well as the disposition of Iran’s yet-to-be-completed Arak
    heavy-water nuclear reactor, resulted in changes in the draft that Zarif was
    unable to accept without further consultations in Tehran – as well as with
    Western capitals.

    As a result, US officials have voiced cautious optimism that an agreement can
    be finalized as early as the end of this week.

    Fabius’s intervention came on the eve of a three-day visit to Israel by
    President Francois Hollande, who received a hero’s welcome in Tel Aviv on
    Sunday.

    It has spurred speculation that Paris is seeking to consolidate its position
    with Washington’s two most-influential allies and Iran’s arch-rivals in the
    region – Israel and Saudi Arabia – at a moment when Obama appears more
    interested in a rapprochement with Tehran for a variety of reasons, including
    hoped-for cooperation in containing the civil war in Syria and stabilizing Iraq
    and Afghanistan.

    Obama spoke by telephone with Hollande last week, and US officials have
    expressed confidence that Paris is cooperating on a new draft that should also
    prove agreeable to Tehran.

    France’s last-minute veto was also cheered by neo-conservatives and other
    hawks, many Republicans, and some Democrats, such as Senate Foreign Relations
    Committee chairman Robert Menendez, who are considered close to the Israel
    lobby which has been pressed hard by Netanyahu to push for the Senate to vote
    on legislation approved last summer by the Republican-led House of
    Representatives. That legislation would sanction foreign companies that import
    any Iranian oil.

    But the Democratic leadership in the Senate, notably the heads of the Armed
    Services Committee, Carl Levin, and Intelligence Committee, Dianne Feinstein,
    have sided with the administration in opposing new sanctions while negotiations
    are underway. Reid, who controls the Senate’s calendar, appears inclined to
    support them.

    Scowcroft and Brzezinski, both of whom opposed the Iraq war, are the latest in
    the foreign policy establishment to come out publicly against additional
    sanctions which, in any case, are most unlikely to be considered by either
    house before Wednesday’s talks begin.

    Leslie Gelb, the president emeritus of the influential Council on Foreign
    Relations (CFR), wrote in the Daily Beast Monday that a short-term deal
    “would lead to the Mideast equivalent of ending the Cold War with the
    Soviet Union … [and] could reduce, even sharply, the biggest threat to
    regional peace, an Iranian nuclear bomb, and open paths to taming dangerous
    conflicts in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan”.

    Writing in the Washington Post on Sunday, former CIA Middle East analyst
    Kenneth Pollack, a key champion of the Iraq War at the Brookings Institution,
    wrote that Israeli demands that Iran be forced to dismantle its nuclear program
    were unrealistic.

    ” … [O]ur worst mistake would be to make an impossible ideal the enemy
    of a tangible, ‘good enough’ agreement … ,” he wrote. “If we can
    get it, such a final deal should be more than adequate to remove the Iranian
    nuclear program as a source of fear and instability in the Middle East.”

    In their letter, Scowcroft and Brzezinski argued that the “agreement under
    discussion would slow crucial elements of the Iran program, make it more
    transparent and allow time to reach a more comprehensive agreement in the
    coming year”.

    “Should the United States fail to take this historic opportunity, we risk
    failing to achieve our non-proliferation goal and losing the support of allies
    and friends while increasing the probability of war,” they wrote.

Leave a Reply

More posts