praag.co.za

Susan Boyle III: Gevaar van die Moderne Droom

Written by

in

’n Mens kan verstaan hoekom Susan Boyle die lied vir haar deurbraakoudisie gekies het. Dit pas goed in haar stem, veral in haar sterk middelregister en gee ook vir haar die geleentheid om haar vokale vaardighede behoorlik ten toon te stel. Daar is egter ook ’n skerp ironie aan die keuse, want dié lied gaan oor ’n droom ja, maar oor die verplettering eerder as die vervulling daarvan.

Aan die woord is Fantine, ’n rimpelkarakter in Victor Hugo se melodramatiese Les Miserables. Hierdie lied, “Ek het ’n Droom Gedroom,” is ’n rou kreet, in werklikheid Fantine se Weeklag, haar klagstaat teen die noodlot. Sy is ’n ongehude moeder, verlaat deur haar minnaar en in ’n desperate oorlewingstryd. Sy werk in ’n fabriek wat aan die voortvlugtende Jean Valjean – in die gedaante van sy alias, Monsieur Madeleine – behoort. Sy word onregverdiglik ontslaan en is nou hoopverlore, met geen manier om geld vir die onderhoud van haar dogtertjie te stuur nie.

Verbitterd mymer sy, in die aanloop tot haar groot musikale oomblik in die musiekdrama, oor vervloë dae toe “mense sorgsaam” en “hulle stemme sag” was, ’n tyd van opwinding en aanvaarding. Dan bars sy los:

“Ek het ’n droom gedroom in dae verby!

Toe hoop hoog geloop het,

En die lewe werd was om te leef.”

Sy het gedroom dat God genadig is en dat liefde nooit sal sterf nie. Sy was jonk en het behoorlik die murg uit die lewe gesuig.

“Maar die tiere kom toe in die nag.

Met hulle stemme sag soos donder

Wanneer hulle jou hoop verskeur

En jou hoop in skande verander.”

Dis nie goeie digkuns nie, maar dit is hoogs dramaties.

Fantine keer nou terug na ’n droom wat sy nie kan afskud nie; van haar minnaar wat na haar sal kom en die jare wat hulle saam sal bly.

“Maar,” herinner sy haarself, “daar is drome wat nie kan wees nie,” en bars dan uit:

“Ek het gedroom my lewe sal so anders wees

As hierdie hel waarin ek leef!”

Haar rouklag is ten slotte:

“Nou het die lewe

Die droom wat ek gedroom het,

Vermoor!”

Hierdie lied, dan, is nie ’n rasiekreet vir die konsep van die Droom nie. Fantine sterf verwerp en verlore in ’n klam tronksel. En al pas die titel naatloos in die toekomstige reklameveldtog van die middeljarige Aspoestertjie wat in ’n prinses omtower is, is daar min in Susan Boyle se lewe in die klein regophuisie in die platteland wat die woorde “die hel waarin ek leef” regverdig. Sy hoef nooit, soos Fantine, uit loutere wanhoop haar hangertjie, haar hare en uiteindelik haarself verkoop om haar dogtertjie in die lewe te hou nie.

Susan Boyle se droom, soos Simon Cowell en sy reklamespan dit presenteer, is ’n glinsterende een, van rykdom en roem, ’n regte eelte-tot-weelde suksesverhaal. Fantine se droom was baie meer prosaïes, maar ook nader aan ’n vroeëre inhoud van die algemene droom: ’n Versugting na ’n lewe sonder komplikasies. Indien sy deur die muur van tyd verplaas kon word, sou Susan se regophuisie en leefstyl Fantine se droom oormatig vervul het (net met haar dogtertjie in plek van Pebbles die kat om die huisie mee te deel.)

In rustelose tye in donker lande, is drome eenvoudig en klein. Groot drome vol swier en glans is vir tye van te veel voorspoed.

In ons tyd het daar ’n verskuiwing in die inhoud, selfs die betekenis van drome gekom, (waar “droom” nie verwys na die vloei van inligting deur die onderbewuste tydens ’n mens se slaap nie.) Die goedkoop, ongenuanseerde postromantiek van die Hollywood-era dring by elke mens aan om ’n droom te hê, nie maar net ’n verdienstelike ambisie nie, maar ’n drang om iets te bekom wat die mens nie self kan bereik nie. “Volg jou droom,” is die mantra. “Droom groot.”

Onderliggend aan dit is die oorskatte waardering van die individu se belangrikheid. In ’n tyd van ongebalanseerde humanisme, van beklemtoning van die enkeling se regte en waarde bo dié van die gemeenskap, word nie net die reg om te droom nie, maar ook om die vervulling van die droom op te eis, vooropgestel. Die Verklarende Woordeboek definieer “lewensdroom” as “verbeelding omtrent dit wat die lewe kan, mag en sal bring.” Moderne mens het “moet” tussen die hulpwerkwoorde ingevoeg. Die droom móét vervul word.Wanneer die jeug aangespoor word om te droom, is die onuitgesproke instruksie dat hulle op vervulling daarvan deur die gemeenskap, die land, die wêreld, God of die heelal sal aandring. ’n Droom wat onvervuld is, is ’n aanklag.

Daar is voorbeelde waar hierdie versugting en hierdie aandrang gewerk het. Dit het vir Susan Boyle gewerk, en dit net na ’n verstommende sameloop wat al die teëltjies reg geval het om haar prentjie te voltooi. Maar vir elke Susan Boyle is daar vyfduisend teleurgestelde dromers wat nie vervulling in Britain’s Got Talent gesmaak het nie. Is dit omdat hulle drome minderwaardig was? Geensins. Hierdie mense volg die mitiese aanwysings om “groot” te droom met dieselfde klipharde intensiteit. En hulle glo met dieselfde onwrikbare oortuiging dat die vervulling vir hulle op daardie selfde verhoog wag.

Die een rede hoekom hierdie realiteits-TV-talentkompetisies so grillerig fassinerend is, is juis om hierdie arme siele in hulle misleiding te sien spartel. Hulle sal met die wêreld se bombasme op die verhoog verskyn, en aankondig dat hulle ook die “gehoor gaan skud,” waarna hulle in die ylste stemme sing, die mees onbeholpe toertjies uitvoer, die mees ondeurdagte kunsies waag… En dan word hulle uitgelag en terug na die buitenste duisternis gejou. Hulle drome is nie net onvervul nie, dit het ’n las geword en het hulle selfvertroue gekwes.

Dit keer nie elke drommel met ’n grinnik en ’n kitaar waarop hy vier basiese akkoorde kan speel om te droom van sterrelewe nie. Hy is maar net getrou aan die instruksie van vandag se gemeenskap; dieselfde gemeenskap wat hom gaan uitlag daarvoor. En as hy struikel, val sy naaste saam met hom. Met die oudisies vir ’n reeks van Suid-Afrika se “Idols” verklaar ’n tienerbruidegom wie se tienerbruid opgedaag het vir die oudisies dat hulle mooi daaroor besin het. Hulle weet dat haar sukses ’n aanpassing in hulle gesinslewe sal verg. Daar is toere, opnames, optredes, onderhoude en die bestuur van ’n gesonde klein fortuin om aan te dink. Maar, hou hy vol, hulle is reg daarvoor. Hulle hoef nie te gewees het nie, want vir haar oudisie sing sy Abba se “Thank you for the music” in die krakerigste gekrys wat ooit die senuwees rougerasper het. Wat het verkeerd geloop? Hulle het gedroom en selfs gewaag om die droom te volg? En nou is hulle klein heelal heeltemal van sy as af.

In Peter Weir se rolprent, “Dead Poet’s Society”, redekawel die ontnugterde Latyn-onderwyser met die fliek se wysgeer oor drome. “Wys vir my ’n man wat onbelas is deur onsinnige drome, en ek wys jou ’n gelukkige man,” sê hy.

“Ah,” sê die ghoeroe (Robin Williams,) “maar net in hulle drome is mense werklik vry, dis hoe dit altyd was en so sal dit altyd wees.”

Ek was eers in sy kamp maar het gedros na die Latyn-onderwyser s’n. Onsinnige en onnodige, uitspattige drome kan net die lewensgang belemmer. Hoekom is dit nie meer genoeg om voor die spieël of vir jou gesin of vriende te sing nie? Is jou sang van gener waarde as dit nie in ’n ouditorium voor vyfduisend mense uitgevoer word nie?

Waar kom hierdie moderne aandrang op droomvervulling vandaan? Dit is hoofsaaklik ’n baksel van ’n bemarkingsbedryf wat onophoudelik agiteer teen ’n normale lewe en die mens wat nie uitsonderlike geluk en voorspoed behaal (deur die regte produkte aan te skaf) nie, verraai homself. Die moderne mens se begrip van die onderskeid tussen planne, ambisie en drome het vervaag. Hy het vergeet dat die vervulling van ’n droom ’n onverdiende geskenk is wat hy nie self kon bewerkstellig nie. Ambisie is ’n ideaal wat, met oorweging van vaardighede en geleenthede, deur harde werk, opoffering en toewyding behaal kan word. ’n Plan is die teoretiese ordening van middele en metodes om die ambisie te vervul. Die mens van die Weste het ’n beskawing gebou deur eers te droom, toe die nodige ambisie te ontwikkel en die regte planne te ontwikkel wat dan met geduld en sweet uitgevoer is. Maar moderne mens het nie meer geduld met ambisie, planne of harde werk nie. Hy dring aan op die vervulling van roekelose drome.

Hierdie onverantwoordelike dromery is nie net ’n krisis van individue nie; dit het die ellende van ’n land geword. Die ANC het die vakuum wat deur De Klerk se oorgawe gelaat is, vervul met die kordaat belofte dat hulle ’n hele nasie se drome sal vervul. As droomvervulling – die onverdiende bereiking van ’n ideaal – in aantog is, is geduld, harde werk en beplanning onnodig. Daar is ’n hele geslag swartmense wat Fantine kan parafraseer. Die ANC het hulle lewensdroom vernietig en die mense is verpletter, al was dit ’n leëdopdroom van motors, groot huise, onafgebroke vloei van kontant en duur klere. Die ANC het hulle droom vermoor, maar erger nog, dit het hulle van gesonde ambisie beroof. Die swart tiener wil nie op die plaas werk nie, al is dit ’n goeie lewe van geborgenheid, met sekuriteit, voordele en aanvaarding in ’n hegte gemeenskap. Harde, eerlike handewerk was goed genoeg vir hulle voorouers, maar nie vir hulle nie. Die droom is om ’n ingenieur, ’n ouditeur, ’n uitvoerende hoof van ’n multinasionale korporasie te wees. En as hy daarvoor moet werk, aandag op skool moet gee, moet leer, opgelei moet word, dan het hý dit maak gebeur, nie waar nie, en is dit geen vervulling van ’n droom nie. Hy wil sy droom hê! Nou!

Fantine het sonder hoop in ’n hoekie van ’n tronksel gesterf. Die swart jeug, vervreem van hulle droom, gaan nie in ’n hoekie opkrul nie. Hulle gaan – is alreeds besig – om verwoed om hulle te slaan na die windverkopers wat hulle verraai het. Die trillings van hierdie argwaan word reeds gevoel. Dit dreig om ’n golf te word en wanneer dit omskakel na onstuitbare branders, moes ons witmense onsself reeds beveilig het.

Is ’n droom dan altyd nutteloos? Geensins nie. ’n Droom roep mense, maar om daarheen te gaan verg ambisie, planne en harde werk.

Ek, en honderdeduisende soos ek, droom van ’n Volkstaat waar die Afrikaner na homself kan omsien en in vrede, veiligheid en voorspoed kan woon, goeie bure vir die state naas hom en ’n aanwins vir die hele streek. Hierdie is ’n edele droom. Daarom verdien dit al ons ambisie, beplanning en ywer. Dít verduidelik die bestaan van Praag.

Kom saam. Dit gaan ’n groot avontuur wees.

Александр Фильчаков прокурор

Comments

3 responses to “Susan Boyle III: Gevaar van die Moderne Droom”

  1. Gas Avatar
    Gas

    Lê daar dalk antwoorde in die Ingrid Jonker-selfmoord in hierdie artikel wat op Global Researcht verskyn oor die selfmoord van Robin Williams:On July 2, 1961, an American icon, Earnest Hemingway, committed suicide at his beloved vacation home in Ketchum, Idaho. He had just flown to Ketchum after being discharged from Mayo Clinic’s psychiatric ward where he had received a series of electroshock “treatments” for a depression that had started after he had experienced the horrors of World War I as an ambulance driver.

    One of his duties was to retrieve fragments of mutilated human bodies in the battle zone. He was haunted by the images of dead and bodies and dying humans for the rest of his life so there was no question that he had what was later to be understood as combat-induced posttraumatic stress disorder, with depression and insomnia. Hemingway himself had been severely wounded by shrapnel. Like many victims of combat-induced PTSD, he drank a lot of alcoholic beverages and had had a series of failed marriages, with financial problems related to the alimony payments to his ex-wives. He understood that his psychiatric ECT “treatment” had erased his memory, and he knew that his writing career, his reason for living, was over.

    Almost exactly 53 years after Hemingway’s suicide, another American icon, Robin Williams, entered a psychiatric facility in Minnesota (July 1, 2014). He had been given an as yet unknown cocktail of prescription drugs that resulted in his losing weight and withdrawing from his loved ones, sleeping, after his discharge later that month, in his darkened bedroom up to 20 hours a day, in an apparent drug-induced stupor.

    Williams was said to have developed Parkinson’s Disease (and had been given some new drugs for it), which can commonly be caused by antipsychotic drugs, now often prescribed, off label (i.e., unapproved for such indications by the FDA), for insomnia, especially psychostimulant drug-induced insomnia (which Williams suffered from). It should be mentioned that antipsychotic drugs (like Abilify, Seroquel, Geodon, etc) also commonly cause diabetes, obesity and hyperlipidemia, in addition to the neurological movement disorders that mimic Parkinson’s Disease. It is also important to note that when a patient suddenly quits antipsychotic drugs (even if first used for non-psychotic indications like insomnia) withdrawal symptoms can occur, such as acute psychoses, hallucinations, insomnia and mania any of which can lead a physician to falsely diagnose schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

    Within weeks after Williams’ discharge from Hazelden’s Rehabilitation facility in Lindstrom, MN, he hung himself in the bedroom of his San Francisco home where he was certainly suffering multiple side effects from his cocktail of drugs. He left no suicide note, but certainly his psychiatrists, psychologists and other staff members at Hazelden know exactly what Williams could have written on such a note. So far Hazelden is mum on what happened to Williams during July’s rehab stay.

    Some of Williams’s closest friends are claiming that the newly prescribed drugs were what killed him, but the media that is swarming all over the tragic event are avoiding those logical and obvious conclusions; for anybody who is aware of the well-known connections between psychiatric prescription drugs and violence, suidicality, dementia, and irrational thoughts and actions (whether while taking the drugs or withdrawing from them) has already asked him or herself the question: “I wonder what psych drugs Robin was on?”

    Knowing that Williams had been under the care of psychiatrists for the last six weeks of his life, certain taboo questions need to be asked and answered.

    But don’t hold your breath. There will be no answers unless we get them in the secret details of what happened at Hazelden, including what brain-altering drugs he was on..

    Shouldn’t There be Penalties for Pushers of Legal Brain-altering Drugs?

    There are penalties for bartenders who serve underage drinkers who go on to have auto accidents while under the influence. There are penalties for street corner drug pushers who supply their junkies with dangerous illicit drugs, and there are penalties for the drug lords who are at the top of the drug supply chain.

    But shouldn’t there also be penalties for legal drug pushers who are supplying medications to their addictive and addicted clients without first obtaining from them fully informed consent after understanding what are the dangers of the drugs? Shouldn’t there be penalties for legal drug pushers who are prescribing dangerous brain-altering psychiatric drugs in combinations that have never even been tested for safety in the animal labs?

    The heretofore respected – and very profitable – industries of Big Pharma, Big Psychiatry, Big Medicine and drug rehabilitation are all very interested in keeping any and all unwelcome truths about the lethality of their products from being aired out in the mainstream press. Thus the rapid disappearance of interest in the celebrity suicides or lethal psych drug overdoses by the time the belated coroner report reveals what drugs were in the victim’s blood and gastric contents. (Note that many coroners are not aware that many psych drugs are detectable in brain tissue long after the time that they disappear from the blood; therefore many coroners don’t bother to test for drugs in brain tissue samples).

    If blood tests are negative for drugs, it is often erroneously assumed by the uninformed public (and even by medical professionals) that drugs aren’t a factor in the aberrant behavior or death of drug-taking patients. Drug withdrawal commonly causes patients to become irrational, violent or suicidal – realities that can occur at any time, even after the drug has disappeared from the blood.

    The Taboo Reality: Psych Drugs Can Cause Suicidalit

    There have been millions of words written about how much everybody was shocked by Williams’ suicide. There have been thousands of flowers placed at any number of temporary shrines. There have been hundreds of comments on the internet from amateur arm-chair psychologists spouting obsolete clichés about suicide, mental illness, drug abuse, alcoholism, cocaine addiction, and how wonderful prescription drugs have been. for depression.

    And there have been dozens of dis-informational essays and website commentaries written by professional psychiatrists who have financial or career connections to Big Pharma, Big Psychiatry, Big Medicine and the rehab industries. Most of those commentaries distract readers from making the connections between suicidality and psych drugs. Some of the comments I have read have preemptively tried to discredit those who are publicly making those connections.

    Whenever unexpected suicides or accidental drug overdoses occur among heavily drugged-up military veterans, active duty soldiers, celebrities or other groups of individuals, I search – often in vain – for information in the print media and on TV, radio and the internet that will identify the drugs that are often involved. There seems to be a taboo on revealing the drug names, dosages, length of usage or who prescribed them. One has to read between the lines or wait until the information might possibly be revealed at http://www.ssristories.org (which, by the way should be mandatory reading for everybody, especially those who prescribe or consume psychiatric drugs)..

    Rarely can I find information about the crazy-making drugs involved, the prescribing physicians or the institutions that were treating the individual before the unexpected death. Patient confidentiality is usually the reason given for the cover-ups – and which is the reason why important teachable moments about these tragedies are lost every day.

    There is a lot of fluff to wade through on those mostly futile searches for the truth about the drugs. The useful information that could clinch the suspected real diagnosis (i.e., psychiatric drug-induced suicidality or psychiatric drug withdrawal syndrome rather than the usual “mental illness” [of unknown cause]) seems to be cleverly concealed – probably with the intent to misinform the public and perpetuate the ever-present, cunningly-implanted myths of mental illness.

    Calling for an Inquest into the Suicide of Robin Williams

    What the Robin Williams’ case needs, especially in view of the American epidemic of prescription psychiatric drug deaths and suicides (tens of thousands every year), is an unbiased judicial inquest to determine the real root causes of his suddens and only partially explained death.

    Autopsies can determine the immediate cause of death but inquests can reveal the underlying motivational or contributing factors involved. And the results of an inquest could be the beginning of a rational discourse about drug-induced violence and drug-induced mental ill health. So far the corporate media’s rush to judgment about celebrity suicides and the violence epidemic has been subverting teachable moments that could save tens of thousands of lives in America. The disinformation so vigorously forced upon us from the four special interest groups mentioned above has guaranteed the dumbing-down of most of the potential consumers of psychiatric drugs, so that most Americans have become true believers in what they are repeatedly told about drugs in the prime time commercials on TV.

    The Marin County coroner has established the preliminary cause of death in Williams’ case: suicide by asphyxiation/hanging. No surprises there. The coroner has also told the press that the toxicology findings on the blood and gastric fluids won’t be ready for 6 weeks (even though the tests could actually be completed in hours or days).

    The confidence of the American public in Big Pharma’s highly profitable drugs and vaccines must not be shaken. Wall Street’s rigged stock market does not easily allow anything that could destroy investor confidence in their major publicly-traded corporation’s products, even if the product is bogus or destructive.

    The beauty of an unbiased public inquest, which should have been done in the case of Adam Lanza and every other school shooter murder-suicide, would be the subpoena power of a grand jury to open up the previously secretive medical records and force testimony from Williams’ treatment team. The public could finally hear information that could make comprehensible the mysterious death of yet another high profile suicide victim and start the process of actually positively America’s suicide and violence epidemics.

    An inquest would likely reveal that Robin Williams did not have a “mental illness of unknown cause” or “bipolar disorder of unknown cause” or “depression of unknown cause” or “suicidality of unknown cause”. An inquest would obtain testimony from medical, psychiatric and psychopharmaceutical experts such as Peter Breggin, MD, Joseph Glenmullen, MD, Grace Jackson, MD, David Healey, MD, Russell Blaylock, MD, Fred Baughmann, MD and other well-informed medical specialists who don’t own stock in Big Pharma and who know well how dangerous their drugs can be.

    Robin Williams not have a Mental Illness of Unknown Etiology

    Just knowing a little about the life and times of Robin Williams (as would also be the case for that long list of drugged-up Hollywood celebrities that “died too soon”) easily disproves most of the amateur or professional theories about his death that have appeared online. The proposed inquest would reveal what happened inside the locked doors of the rehab facility.

    What is the major reason that many psych drug sceptics, medical professionals and psychiatric survivors want an inquest in the Williams’ suicide? We want to know the names of the ingredients in the cocktail of drugs that had been tried on him (and the dosages and length of time they were taken). We want to know what side effects he had from the drugs and what his responses were. We want to know what was the reasoning behind the decision to prescribe unproven drug cocktails on someone whose brain was already adversely affected by the past use of potentially brain damaging drugs.

    And we want to know, for the sake of past and future victims of these neurotoxic drugs, if the prescribing practitioners fully informed Williams about the dangers of his treatments, particularly the black box warning that is at the top of every product information packet of every SSRI drug: that the risk of suicide is doubled in those who take them. And we want to know if Williams knew that the drug cocktails that were prescribed for him had never actually been tested for either short or long-term safety on lab animals or humans?

    (It is important to remind ourselves here that no psychiatric multi-drug combinations have ever been approved by the FDA for use on human subjects, with the outrageous exception being the approval for marketing that the FDA gave for the use of the anti-psychotic drug Abilify in combination with SSRI antidepressants [a combination apparently found to be modestly safe and modestly effective in short-term trials] in cases where the SSRI drug alone had failed to relieve the sadness in some subjects.)

    Stress-induced and Drug-induced Mental Ill Health Doesn’t Mean One Has a Mental Illness (of Unknown Etiology)

    Robin Williams gained fame and fortune as a comic actor, starting with what was to become his trade mark manic acting style (stimulant drug-induced mania?) on “Mork and Mindy”. As have many other famous persons that attained sudden wealth, Williams spent his millions of dollars lavishly and – in retrospect – often foolishly. After his third marriage he found that he could no longer afford the Hollywood lifestyle.

    But long before his two divorces and his subsequent serious financial difficulties caused him to crack and fall of the sobriety wagon for the final time, Robin Williams had lived in the fast lane, working long exhausting days and partying long exhausting nights with the help of stimulant drugs like the dependency-inducing drug cocaine (that overcomes sleepiness and fatigue) and tranquilizers like the equally dependency-inducing alcohol (that can counteract the drug-induced mania and drug-induced insomnia that often results from psycho-stimulants like cocaine, nicotine, caffeine, Ritalin, Prozac, Paxil, Wellbutrin, amphetamines, etc).

    Williams had acknowledged that he was addicted to both cocaine and alcohol when his famous comedian friend John Belushi died of an accidental drug overdose shortly after they had snorted some cocaine together (March 4, 1962). (BELUSHI DIED MARCH 5 1982 ) Williams quit both drugs cold turkey, and he remained sober and cocaine-free for the next 20 years. There is no public information about the possible use of addictive prescription drugs, but it is well-known that many Hollywood personalities have close relationships with both prescription-writing physicians and illicit drug pushers.

    However, Williams did relapse in 2006 and started abusing drugs and alcohol again, eventually being admitted to a Hazelden drug rehab facility in Oregon. After “taking the cure” he continued his exhausting career making movies, doing comedy tours and engaging in personal appearances in order to “pay the bills and support my family”.

    After two expensive divorces, huge indebtedness and an impending bankruptcy, Williams was forced, in September of 2013, to sell both his $35,000,000 home and his ranch in Napa Valley. He moved into a more modest, more affordable home in the San Francisco area, where he lived until his suicide.

    But despite solving his near-bankruptcy situation (which would make any sane person temporarily depressed), Williams continued having a hard time paying the bills and making the alimony payments; and he was forced to go back to making movies (which he despised doing because of the rigorous schedule, working long days and being away from his family for extended periods of time. He hated the fact that he was being financially forced to sign a contract to do a “Mrs. Doubtfire” sequel later in 2014.

    For regular income, he took a job doing a TV comedy series called “The Crazy Ones”, but the pressures of working so hard got him drinking again, even using alcohol on the set, which he had never done before. He was making $165,000 per episode and was counting on continuing the series beyond the first season in order to have a steady income.

    So when CBS cancelled the show in May 2014, humiliation, sadness, nervousness and insomnia naturally set in, and he decided to go for professional help at a Hazelden facility in my home state of Minnesota, spending most of July 2014 as an inpatient there. In retrospect, that decision had fatal consequences. The public deserves to know what really happened inside that facility.

    Robin Williams ended his life shortly after being prescribed a cocktail of unproven drugs that had never been certified by the FDA as either safe or effective.

    There are no reports about any electroshock treatments ever having been given to Williams, but an inquest to bring to light important details such as that would certainly go a long ways to de-mystify his untimely death. It is the least that could be done to honor the man, give some additional meaning to his life and perhaps make something good come out of the bad that has so unnecessarily confused us survivors.

    Robin Williams’ fans certainly deserve to know what really happened to him. There are many painful lessons to be learned, and we should be mature enough by now to learn them.

    The psychiatric drug-taking public deserves to know what were the offending drugs that might have contributed to his anguish, sadness, nervousness, insomnia, sleep deprivation, hopelessness and irrational, very likely drug-induced, suicide.

    And the family and friends of Robin Williams certainly deserve to understand the essential facts of the case which, without an inquest, will otherwise just result in a continuation of America’s “mysterious” suicide and violence epidemics, and the continuation of Big Pharma’s unjust gravy train that has been deceiving – and destroying – so many for so long.

    For more information on the above very serious issues, check out these websites:

    http://www.ssristories.com, http://www.mindfreedom.org, http://www.breggin.com, http://www.cchrint.org, http://www.drugawareness.org, http://www.psychrights.org,www.quitpaxil.org, http://www.endofshock.com, http://www.madinamerica.com.

    Dr Kohls is a family physician who, until his retirement in 2008, practiced holistic (non-drug) mental health care. Dr Kohls warns against the abrupt discontinuation of any psychiatric drug because of the common, often serious withdrawal symptoms that can occur in patients who have been taking any dependency-inducing psychoactive drug, whether legal or illicit. He recommends close consultation with an aware, informed physician who is familiar with drug withdrawal syndromes, the dangers of psychiatric drug use and the nutritional needs of the drug-toxified and nutritionally-depleted brain.

    Dr Kohls is a past member of MindFreedom International, the International Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology and the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. He is the editor of the occasional Preventive Psychiatry E-Newsletter.

  2. Betzie van Rensburg Avatar
    Betzie van Rensburg

    Mens moet versigtig wees om valse verwagtinge by mense te skep en dit dan die skep van hoop te noem .Verskoon hier die Engels . n ‘ False consciousness ‘ ontstaan en dit is bitter gevaarlik .

  3. Dolk Avatar
    Dolk

    Dr. D Roodt: “’n Droom wat onvervuld is, is ’n aanklag.”

    ‘n Onvervulde droom is soos tronkstraf wat mens uitdien… Party s’n is sonder parool… Partymaal laat ‘n onvervulde droom jou soos ‘n kwadrupleeg… Kan dit jou selfs graf toe dryf.

    ‘n Mens met ‘n lewe sonder drome, is soos ‘n dier wat sonder kos en water aan iets vasgeketting staan – wat van ander se aalmoese afhanklik is…

    En toe ek opkyk…, sien ek ons Volk soos eindelose rye diere – gejuk, nog erger – herkouend, geketting staan…

Leave a Reply